Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1344126)	2/22/2022 9:28:01 PM
From: Sdgla	2 Recommendations Recommended By D.Austin Winfastorlose Respond to of 1576164

Pennsylvania Governor Candidate Josh Shapiro Covered Up Election Fraud Complaints Against Democrats As Attorney General By Patrick Howley Patrick Howley is the experienced reporter who exposed Ralph Northam's racist yearbook photos, Cal Cunningham's extramarital affair, the VA scandal, and broke other groundbreaking articles that have permanently altered the United States' political landscape. @http://twitter.com/HowleyReporter February 17, 2022 at 6:28pm Pennsylvania Democrat attorney general Josh Shapiro, who is now running for Governor of Pennsylvania, stands accused of covering up election fraud complaints against Democrats dating back years during his current tenure as attorney general, leading a whistleblower to accuse Shapiro of being “criminally negligent.” “AG Shapiro turned a blind eye to the alleged criminal wrongdoing of members of the Democrat Party in our county (Fayette County, Pennsylvania). These same Democrats now owe gubernatorial candidate Shapiro their support in his run for the governorship. They hosted him recently,” whistleblower Robert Frasconi told NATIONAL FILE, noting that he made a formal 2018 complaint directly to Shapiro “after the numerous contacts to his subordinates went unanswered.” Robert Frasconi told NATIONAL FILE: “1. A case of alleged election fraud involving a former Democrat state representative who served 10 years as state representative in the 51st Legislative District. Timothy S. Mahoney was elected alongside Josh Shapiro after the middle-of-the-night pay raise scandal of July 2005. Shapiro and Mahoney served together on the House Reform Committee. They are friends. Mahoney pushed for a countywide referendum on school consolidation in 2011. Pennsylvania law does not permit advisory referenda. Thus, I and my colleague, Delinda Young, challenged Mahoney’s referendum petition in the local PA Court of Common Pleas. We prevailed, and Mahoney’s referendum petition was struck. We later came to learn of Mahoney’s election fraud — he altered and falsified affidavits of circulator and signed as the sole affiant, as if he solely circulated the petitions. He also perjured himself in the courtroom as he lied about the circulation period for his referendum petitions. Mahoney receives credit for pushing for the PA’s so-called Open Records law. Interestingly, we made open records requests for Mahoney’s per diem records during his purported circulation period of his referendum petitions June 1 – Aug. 8, 2011. As Mahoney then sat on the House Appropriations Committee, and as the PA budget must by law be completed by July 1, the per diem records showed that Mahoney was reimbursed for overnight stays in Harrisburg (200-plus miles away from Fayette County). Thus, Mahoney could not be in Harrisburg and before 50 continuously circulating referendum petitions as he attested on his altered and falsified affidavits of circulator. In short, the proof of Mahoney’s election fraud is incontrovertible and irrefutable. My colleague, Delinda Young, and I went through two election boards, two district attorneys, and three AGs (including Josh Shapiro) to no avail as they all covered for Mahoney. Robert Frasconi stated: “2. In 2012, Fayette County DA Jack R. Heneks, Jr. made an application to impanel a county investigating grand jury. Primarily, the Grand Jury was impanelled to investigate election related issues along with some other issues. Three election-related referrals were made to DA Heneks by the Fayette County Election Board. Mahoney’s alleged election fraud was one of those referrals. As then-DA Heneks and Mahoney are friends, the Grand Jury never issued a presentment against Mahoney. In fact, there were eight presentments issued by the Grand jury. Seven of the eight were dealt with; however, the 5th Presentment was sealed by Presiding Judge Steve P. Leskinen on 12/12/2014. The docket sheet for Fayette County Grand Jury #2 on the Unified Judicial System database shows that the 5th Presentment remains sealed to this very day and that the status of the Grand Jury is active, although the grand jurors were dismissed nearly nine years ago! Shapiro was made aware of all this in a 2018 official complaint.”