SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Maloney who wrote (23696)2/24/2022 4:03:32 PM
From: maceng22 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
tntpal

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37496
 
The numbers for Scotland.

rumble.com

and surprise surprise.

scotsman.com

also.




To: Terry Maloney who wrote (23696)2/24/2022 4:21:53 PM
From: Graystone3 Recommendations

Recommended By
gg cox
kidl
Terry Maloney

  Respond to of 37496
 
And here is what that pdf really says
or
Get vaccinated

This paragraph is taken from the pdf which as you note does not contain the graph posted..
<<Findings from a Scottish study, show that people who have received two doses of COVID19 vaccine
are far better protected against death from the virus than those who are unvaccinated. However, there
are certain characteristics which can make people more vulnerable, including being aged 80 or
over, having multiple underlying health conditions, and being male. Results show that adults aged
18-64 who are double vaccinated have almost four times increased protection against dying from
COVID-19 compared to those who are unvaccinated. The figures are even more stark for those who
are older, with double vaccinated adults aged 65-79 experiencing 15.5 times greater protection against
death than their unvaccinated peers, and for adults over 80, this increased to 30 times higher.>>
The age adjusted rate of mortality table in that paper is even clearer. Get boosted if you haven't.

These protests were never about vaccine mandates, that was just convenient.
It was a well planned and well funded attack on Canada that went awry.
The attackers wanted to bring down the government in a No Confidence Vote.
If that failed they would blame the government for creating the very protest they planned and paid for.
You saw Poilievre stand up and say "Trudeau engineered the protests for political gain".
He is telling enough just enough of the truth to be believable, it was an engineered attack all right.
Lying about who should be blamed has been a cornerstone of the Conservative plot since this started.
The intent of the salvage operation now is simply to deflect public attention away from the crime scene.
Lying about vaccines is just a tactic to misdirect attention.
The Conservative Party of Canada and Poilievre invested a lot of political capital supporting the occupation.
Canadians were generally disgusted by those urinating on the War Memorial, throwing trash on Terry Fox.
Not the Conservatives, they said the attackers were passionate, the leader said they were "good people".



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (23696)2/24/2022 5:34:12 PM
From: teevee2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
maceng2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37496
 
Here is the original reference:

publichealthscotland.scot

You can see commentary on it here:

stevekirsch.substack.com

Enjoy your jabs, and please book your 2nd booster asap.



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (23696)2/24/2022 6:34:58 PM
From: golfer72  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37496
 
And CDC is pushing the vaccine even after getting caught covering up side effects. Your point is?