SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Agouron Pharmaceuticals (AGPH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JOHN W. who wrote (3770)2/8/1998 1:03:00 PM
From: JOHN W.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6136
 
"HIV Drugs Credited for Saving Lives in New York"
Reuters (02/05/98)
At the Fifth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic
Infections Mary Anne Chiasson of the New York City Department of
Health reported that AIDS deaths in the city fell by 30 percent
between 1995 and 1996. The decline was attributed to the
increased availability of protease inhibitors. A research team
led by Chiasson followed 150 AIDS patients who died during 1996
and 150 who did not die, and found that 10 percent of those who
died had taken protease inhibitors, versus 32 percent of those
who lived.



To: JOHN W. who wrote (3770)2/8/1998 9:32:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 6136
 
John, I just uploaded the initial Reuter's story which seemed to indicate that the buffalo humps were associated with PIs in general not just Crix. The subsequent report named several PIs, supporting the first report. The per cent affect varies widely. Usually this discrepancy happens because the low numbers are from studies that don't look very hard, while the high numbers come from studies specifically looking for the condition. A good example would be phen/fen. Millions took the drug and no one really noticed the heart irregularities. When patients were subsequently tested, 1/3 had the defect. I suspect its the same for Buffalo Hump. If patients have been on a PI for a reasonable period of time (1 or 2 years), I suspect that the per cent will be much higher than 1%, and the condition will be associated with all PIs. Earlier characterizations of the condition as "insignificant" would be premature at best and grossly misleading at worst (actually the worst could be much stronger than grossly misleading).

As far as the cross resistance is concerned, I initially expressed surprise, base on the Jesse Eisinger article that came out several months ago. Your recent upload confirms my earlier posts. There is cross resistance (in the AGPH study, a significant per cent who started on Viracept and failed, were not able to achieve long lasting effects with subsequent PIs). The recent upload also fails to address my comments about time (I don't think that 24 weeks is a long time) and sensitivity (a detection limit of 500 copied per ml is not very sensitive).



To: JOHN W. who wrote (3770)2/9/1998 6:37:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6136
 
Speaking of viral resistance, earlier I had indicated that resistant strains would be spread as concerns about the disease eased due to successful treatment. Today Reuter's has an article on HIV status disclosure. Lack of disclosure is rather high, especially among men:

B O S T O N, Feb. 9 - A study due to
be published today found that three
out of four women infected with the
AIDS virus told their sexual partners
while about half the number of
infected men disclosed their
affliction.
Led by Brown University's Dr. Michael
Stein, researchers at two New England city
hospitals found that only 52 percent of men
opposed to 78 percent of women told their
sexual partners of their HIV status. The
study will be published in today's Archives
of Internal Medicine.
Of those who did not disclose they were
infected with the HIV virus that causes
AIDS, only 42 percent said they always
used a condom during sexual intercourse.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention have long recommended
condoms as a method of preventing the
spread of AIDS.

Partners Left Not Knowing
The researchers interviewed HIV patients
who reported having sexual partners during
the previous six months and found that
among those who had one steady partner,
21 percent failed to disclose their status.
"There are powerful forces working in
favor of non-disclosure," the researchers
said. "First, there are the psychological
consequences of disclosure, especially the
risk of rejection."
Among the 129 HIV patients in the
study, 69 percent were men. Drug users
made up 41 percent of those in the study,
while 20 percent said they were homosexual
or bisexual and 39 percent were
heterosexual.
There have been recent calls for state and
city health departments to publicly identify
people who have tested positive for HIV.
Stein added in an interview, "It comes
down to personal responsibility and no
public health intervention will solve the
problem.
"The recommendation we reached is an
old one, which is that condoms should be
used as much as possible if not always," he
said.