Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFMX - Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (9146)	2/8/1998 7:25:00 PM
From: J Bertrand	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14631

Stephen, I disagree with your analysis of Murphy. I took his AMAT suggestion last year to see the stock go from 25 to 105 in 6 months. He was adamant that AMAT was the most undervalued tech stock last year. It proved him correct by quadrupling. I still think AMAT is a no brainer that patient investors will see at $300-$400 a share in 7-10 years. I know that everyone points to the Ross debacle as proof that Murphy is a poor stock picker. But, nobody including Warren Buffett is ever 100% correct with his/her picks. I think your comments are unfair to a good stock picker like Murphy. Jeff Bertrand