Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (23794)	2/26/2022 11:29:03 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37403

<<There is little doubt that Agence-France Presse is one of the most trustworthy and unbiased news agencies in the world.>> Well, I could accurately say that *Reuters* has a long record, hundreds of years, of high quality news reporting and.... fact checking. It does not accurately reflect what a standing joke of BS Reuters is these days. Just like a lot of TV stations, it sold itself out over the last 20 years or so, and now is an official “Ministry of Truth (Lies)” Do I need to spell out to you why that is the case? OK, until you brought it up, I had no idea about AFP or even what they do. It appeared to me some time ago that the Press in general, including the fact checkers, were a circle jerk funded by the WEF and associates. They practically boast about the fact. In short the press is bought and paid for. Once upon a time I used to read the UK Guardian Newspaper. These days I cannot bare to hardly look at it. It makes me want to throw up. Let me see if there is anything that might burst the balloon of fantasy that AFP are anything otherwise. Turns out I don't have to look any further than Canada. Sold to the highest bidder \| Climate Discussion Nexus And there is a treasure trove of information just there... Checking the Fact Checkers (rumble.com) I am not here to discuss Climate change, but that does it for me...Really. -g- Hey, rather than continue this long winded load of crapola, back and forth about the supposed “sanctity of the press”, an argument you will lose imho, why don’t you actually grow a pair and look at the CCCA presentation and tell me where it might be wrong? Check your fact checkers if you like, and see if you can make a start. You have actually have to listen and watch to the presentation, but maybe your too good for that ?