SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/1/2022 9:50:04 PM
From: pocotrader  Respond to of 1576081
 
LOL your a hoot comrade



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 7:19:08 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1576081
 
High Court Ends New Zealand's Vaccine Mandate: 'Gross Violation of Human Rights'


slaynews.com /news/high-court-ends-new-zealand-vaccine-mandate-gross-violation-human-rights/

A New Zealand high court has ended the government’s vaccine mandate, ruling that the order represented a “gross violation of human rights.”

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was left reeling after the court determined that forcing New Zealanders to take vaccines is a breach of the Bill of Rights.


The landmark ruling now means that the police and New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) cannot be fired for refusing to get vaccinated.

Legal experts cheered the move, noting that the case will now be used to overthrow all of Ardern’s illegal mandates in New Zealand.

Justice Francis Cooke ruled that ordering frontline police officers and Defence staff to be vaccinated or face losing their job was not a “reasonably justified” breach of the Bill of Rights.

The lawyer for the police and Defence staff at the center of the claim is now calling for the suspended workers to return to their jobs immediately, saying many have given decades of service to their community and are still committed to their jobs.

The challenge, put forward by a group of Defence force and police employees, questioned the legality of making an order under the Covid-19 Public Health Response Act to require vaccination for frontline employees.

The challenge was supported by a group of 37 employees affected by the mandate, who submitted written affidavits to the court, according to the NZ Herald.

Minister of Workplace Relations and Safety Michael Wood, Deputy Police Commissioner Tania Kura, and NZDF Chief People Officer Brigadier Matthew Weston filed affidavits defending the mandate.

As it stands, 164 of the overall police workforce of nearly 15,700 were affected by the mandate after choosing not to be vaccinated.

NOTICE: ATLBlaze is run by pedophiles and supports child sex abuse. If you support ATLBlaze, you support the sexual abuse of children.

For NZDF, the mandate affected 115 of its 15,500 staff.

The group relied on two aspects of the Bill of Rights – the right to decline a medical procedure and the right to religious freedom.

On the religious freedom argument, a number of those who made submissions referred to their fundamental objection to taking the Pfizer vaccine, given that it was tested on the cells that were derived from a human fetus.

Justice Cooke agreed with the claim, saying that “an obligation to receive the vaccine which a person objects to because it has been tested on cells derived from a human fetus, potentially an aborted fetus, does involve a limitation on the manifestation of a religious belief.”

However, Justice Cooke disagreed with the claimants’ broader claims that requiring vaccination is inconsistent with holding religious beliefs more generally.

“I do not accept that a belief in an individual’s bodily integrity and personal autonomy is a religious belief or practice. Rather it seems to me, in the circumstances of this case, to be a belief in the secular concept referred to in section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act.”

Justice Cooke also agreed with the claim that the mandate impinged on the right to decline a medical procedure.

The judge said that while it’s clear the government isn’t forcing Police and NZDF employees to get vaccinated against their will and they still have the right to refuse vaccination, the mandate presents an element of pressure.

“The associated pressure to surrender employment involves a limit on the right to retain that employment, which the above principles suggest can be thought of as an important right or interest recognized not only in domestic law but in the international instruments,” Justice Cooke stated.

But in considering the two claims, Justice Cooke also considered whether or not the mandate fell within the definitions laid out in the Covid-19 Public Health Response Act.

The court accepted that vaccination has a significant beneficial effect in limiting serious illness, hospitalization, and death, including with the Omicron variant.

However, it was less effective in reducing infection and transmission of Omicron than had been the case with other variants of Covid-19.

“In essence, the order mandating vaccinations for police and NZDF staff was imposed to ensure the continuity of the public services, and to promote public confidence in those services, rather than to stop the spread of Covid-19,” the judge said.

“Indeed health advice provided to the government was that further mandates were not required to restrict the spread of Covid-19. I am not satisfied that continuity of these services is materially advanced by the order.”

“Covid-19 clearly involves a threat to the continuity of police and NZDF services.

“That is because the Omicron variant, in particular, is so transmissible.

“But that threat exists for both vaccinated and unvaccinated staff. I am not satisfied that the order makes a material difference, including because of the expert evidence before the court on the effects of vaccination on Covid-19 including the Delta and Omicron variants.”

An additional claim that the mandate would disproportionately affect Maori was dismissed by Justice Cooke.



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 7:26:03 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1576081
 
Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study

www.theepochtimes.com /pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-goes-into-liver-cells-and-is-converted-to-dna-study_4307594.html

The messenger RNA (mRNA) from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA, according to Swedish researchers at Lund University.

The researchers found that when the mRNA vaccine enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA, which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA.


Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, whereas the normal transcription process involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nucleus.


“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in the study, published in Current Issues of Molecular Biology. “BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure.”

BNT162b2 is another name for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that is marketed under the brand name Comirnaty.

The whole process occurred rapidly within six hours. The vaccine’s mRNA converting into DNA and being found inside the cell’s nucleus is something that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said would not happen.

“The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” the CDC said on its web page titled “ Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”

This is the first time that researchers have shown in vitro or inside a petri dish how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, and is what health experts and fact-checkers said for over a year couldn’t occur.

The CDC says that the “COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” claiming that all of the ingredients in both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (administered in the United States) are discarded from the body once antibodies are produced. These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response.

Pfizer didn’t comment on the findings of the Swedish study and said only that its mRNA vaccine does not alter the human genome.

“Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell,” a Pfizer spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email. “It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity.”

More than 215 million or 64.9 percent of Americans are fully vaccinated as of Feb. 28, with 94 million having received a booster dose.

A 3D print of a spike protein of SARS-CoV-2—the virus that causes COVID-19—in front of a 3D print of a SARS-CoV-2 virus particle. (Courtesy of NIAID/RML)Autoimmune DisordersThe Swedish study also found spike proteins expressed on the surface of the liver cells that researchers say may be targeted by the immune system and possibly cause autoimmune hepatitis, as “there [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination.”

The authors of the first reported case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis a week after her first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine said that there is a possibility that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals” as it has been shown that “severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection are characterized by an autoinflammatory dysregulation that contributes to tissue damage,” which the virus’s spike protein appears to be responsible for.

Spike proteins may circulate in the body after an infection or injection with a COVID-19 vaccine. It was assumed that the vaccine’s spike protein would remain mostly at the injection site and last up to several weeks like other proteins produced in the body. But studies are showing that is not the case.

The Japanese regulatory agency’s biodistribution study ( pdf) of the Pfizer vaccine showed that some of the mRNAs moved from the injection site and through the bloodstream, and were found in various organs such as the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries of rats 48 hours following injection.

In a different study, the spike proteins made in the body after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot have been found on tiny membrane vesicles called exosomes—that mediate cell-to-cell communication by transferring genetic materials to other cells—for at least four months after the second vaccine dose.

The persistence of the spike protein in the body “raises the prospect of sustained inflammation within and damage to organs which express the spike protein,” according to experts at Doctors for COVID Ethics, an organization consisting of physicians and scientists “seeking to uphold medical ethics, patient safety, and human rights in response to COVID-19.”


“As long as the spike protein can be detected on cell-derived membrane vesicles, the immune system will be attacking the cells that release these vesicles,” they said.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Whether the findings of the study will occur in living organisms or if the DNA converted from the vaccine’s mRNA will integrate with the cell’s genome is unknown. The authors said more investigations are needed, including in whole living organisms such as animals, to better understand the potential effects of the mRNA vaccine.

“At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on gen



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 7:27:18 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1576081
 

Australian Researchers Find Lockdowns “Detrimental” To Mental Health

- RETARDS HAD TO RESEARCH THIS!!!



www.theepochtimes.com /australian-researchers-find-lockdowns-detrimental-to-mental-health_4308291.html

Australian researchers have confirmed that lockdowns are detrimental to mental health, according to a new study conducted by the Australian National University (ANU).

The study which focused on Melbourne during the second wave of lockdowns found that despite the effectiveness of the restrictions in controlling the spread of the CCP virus, the approach “adversely impacted [Melbourne residents’] levels of depression and loneliness.”

Melbourne, which endured the world’s longest period in lockdown under the authority of state Premier Daniel Andrews in Victoria, weathered 6 lockdowns over the first two years of the pandemic.

Lockdown is estimated to have increased depressive symptoms by approximately 23 percent and feelings of loneliness by 4 percent,” the study’s authors said.

There is “robust evidence on the short-term mental health impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns,” the authors concluded.

“These results illustrate the importance of the social environment on individuals’ mental health and the need for future research and interventions in this area.”

The team, led by ANU researcher James O’Donnell conducted three surveys on Melbourne residents from May to Oct. 2020, coinciding with the “second wave” of cases and lockdown restrictions due to an outbreak from Victoria’s hotel quarantine in late May 2020.

A man crosses the normally busy intersection of Flinders Street and Swanston Street in Melbourne, Australia on May 28, 2021. (Darrian Traynor/Getty Images)The second survey was taken from mid-June to mid-July 2021 and coincided with periods of lifted restrictions in early June and reimposed lockdowns in mid-July.

Mental health was examined using the DASS-21 test for both depression and anxiety. Loneliness was tested on responses to the three-item Loneliness Scale with questions such as “how often do you feel isolated from others” with respondents needing to answer from hardly ever, sometimes, or often.

The team found higher depression scores for the first survey and third survey—both were taken during lockdowns—with respondents falling into the bracket for mild levels of depression.

In comparison, the second survey, taken primarily during lifted restrictions had a lower score for depression with respondents scoring an average of less than 1 and leaning to the normal range of 0-9 for depression.

Police place a face mask on an arrested protester at the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne on Sept. 5, 2020 during an anti-lockdown rally protesting the state’s strict lockdown laws as a preventive measure against the COVID-19 coronavirus. (William West / AFP via Getty Images)Loneliness levels were also higher for the first and third surveys, while the second also showed a drop in levels in line with the depression study.

The team also found, whilst 2021 studies in Europe and surveys on NSW taken at the same time as the study showed that anxiety also went up from lockdowns, those findings were not observed in the Melbourne study.

In fact, scores for anxiety appeared to decrease; going from mild levels of anxiety in survey 1 to normal levels for both the second and third surveys.

However, researchers argued this could be due to erosion of respondents as the study progressed with the sample size decreasing from 3028, to 2034, then 1723 respondents for each subsequent study.



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 8:38:24 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1576081
 
Boeing suspends parts, maintenance and support for Russian airlines
reuters.com



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 8:54:22 AM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1576081
 
OOPS! GOP torn as Greene speaks to far right amid ‘Putin!’ chants
apnews.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican leaders in Congress are torn over what to do with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after the congresswoman spoke at a weekend event organized by a white nationalist who marveled over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as the crowd erupted in chants of “Putin!”

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the congresswoman’s speech on the same stage “unacceptable.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said “there’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists.”

Yet it’s unclear whether Greene will face any further reprimand or rebuke for what is now an ongoing pattern of startling behavior. McCarthy had previously suggested the Georgia congresswoman, who is now barred by Democrats from committees, would enjoy a promotion i f Republicans take control of the House.

It all shows the difficulty Republican leaders have combating the party’s drift toward Trump-style authoritarianism and embracing right-wing extremism.

“This may be a chance to burn out the cancer of the Republican Party — those that are, you know, Putin sympathetic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., a former military pilot who broke with his party over the Trump presidency.

But he worries that McCarthy and other GOP leaders will stop short of kicking Greene out of the party. “He won’t because she has power, let’s be honest, but I’m embarrassed by it.”

The scrutiny over the congresswoman, who remains an outlier on Capitol Hill, comes as most of Congress is largely unified in its condemnation of Russian President Vladimir Putin and its support of Ukraine. Ahead of President Joe Biden’s first State of the Union address, the invasion has proven to be a rare moment of common ground amid Democrats and Republicans as the U.S. defends the Western-style democracy.

This is not the first time Greene, of Georgia, has broken the norms of political behavior by associating with extremist groups, espousing conspiracy theories or musing about violence against politicians she disagrees with. Shortly after taking off in 2021, the House voted to strip the new lawmaker of committee assignments over her views and actions, in a largely party-line vote.

“For me, it was appalling and wrong,” McCarthy told reporters at the Capitol late Monday.

Asked to elaborate Tuesday as cameras were rolling during a press conference at the Capitol, McCarthy demurred, declining further response, as other Republican leaders and lawmakers stood by. “There’s no place in our party for any of this,” he had said.

McConnell offered no public comments, but said in a statement from his office: ’There’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists or anti-Semitism.”

Greene defended her appearance at the America First Political Action Committee event, saying she will continue sharing her message to “every corner” of the U.S. She has said she did not personally know the organizer or his beliefs, and participated so she could speak to the large crowd.

But the organization is not unfamiliar to Greene or several other Republicans in Congress including Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who has said they had briefly considered forming an America First Caucus in Congress. Another, Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who has also spoken to the group.

The America First Political Action Committee was launched by Nick Fuentes, who is considered by anti-hate groups as a white nationalist. He grew to prominence after the 2017 neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville that brought the far-right’s enthusiasm for Donald Trump into the streets during the first year of his presidency.

Greene kicked off the group’s weekend conference in Florida, which was billed as a far-right alternative to the more established Conservative Political Action Conference that drew Trump and other GOP elected officials to Orlando over the weekend.

The congresswoman was welcomed to the stage after Fuentes led the crowd of mostly white men into a rousing embrace of Russia, marveling at its show of strength invading Ukraine.

“Can we get a round of applause for Russia?” he asked. The crowd chanted “Putin! Putin!”

Fuentes said more than 1,000 had gathered for his event, the third and biggest so far, and that the “secret sauce” of the organization’s strength was “these young white men.” He mocked the Democrats’ mantra that diversity is a strength.

Fallout has been mixed. On Tuesday, Republican U.S. Sen. candidate Herschel Walker dropped plans to attend a “Shall Not Be Infringed” rally for gun rights that Greene is set to host this upcoming weekend in Rome, Georgia.

Walker no longer plans to speak at the rally, spokesperson Mallory Blount told The Associated Press on Tuesday, without giving a reason.

But David Perdue, who the former Republican senator who Trump is backing in a primary challenge to incumbent Gov. Brian Kemp, still plans to attend.

“Perdue has also been clear that Putin is a murderer and a thug who has been enabled by Biden’s weakness and must be stopped,” said spokesperson Jenni Sweat.

Another Republican Senate candidate, Gary Black, the agricultural commissioner, said in a Tuesday statement that Greene’s ideas and judgement “are a poison in the bloodstream of our party.”

While McCarthy said he would be meeting with Greene, other Republicans were stepping in to offer their own views.

Asked if Greene or the others should be kicked out of the GOP, Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, once the party’s presidential nominee, said: “They should be laughed out.”



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 9:13:02 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576081
 
KABOOM: 78% of AMERICAN VOTERS APPROVE PRESIDENT BIDEN SOTU SPEECH... locoLOSER's HEAD JUST EXPLODED... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1345918)3/2/2022 9:22:06 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1576081
 
After Claiming He Wanted To 'Denazify' Ukraine, NAZI POS Putin Strikes Holocaust Memorial Site
Babyn Yar is the site of one of the worst mass killings of Jews during World War II.
By Amanda Terkel
03/01/2022 04:07pm EST | Updated an hour ago
huffpost.com

Ukrainian officials reported Tuesday that a Russian missile strike apparently targeting Kyiv’s main TV and radio tower had also hit the Babyn Yar Holocaust Memorial. Five people died in the bombing.

“To the world: what is the point of saying «never again» for 80 years, if the world stays silent when a bomb drops on the same site of Babyn Yar? At least 5 killed. History repeating…” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy tweeted Tuesday.

The attack comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin invoked World War II as a justification for invading Ukraine, saying he wanted to “denazify” the country.

As The Washington Post noted, Putin’s comments were likely meant to help sell the invasion back home, where “rhetoric around fighting fascism resonates deeply” still.

Other countries quickly called Putin out for his cynical twisting of history. To start, Zelenskyy himself is Jewish and had family members killed in the Holocaust.



A blast is seen in Kyiv's main TV tower amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine on March 1.

Putin’s target may not have been Babyn Yar, but rather the TV tower located close to the memorial. The New York Times reported that videos captured at least two other explosions in the area, in addition to the one that struck the tower itself.

But the damaging of Babyn Yar further delegitimizes Putin’s purported motives.

Babyn Yar is the site of one of the worst mass murders of Jews during the Holocaust. On Sept. 29-30, 1941, Nazi killing squads executed more than 33,000 people there.

Nazis murdered an estimated 100,000 people at Babyn Yar during World War II.



The Mirror Field audiovisual installation in memory of Babyn Yar victims at the Babyn Yar National Historical Memorial, pictured on Oct. 5, 2020.

MAXYM MARUSENKO/NURPHOTO VIA GETTY IMAGES

In response to the Babyn Yar attack Tuesday, the Auschwitz Memorial in Poland tweeted, “It’s hard to expect the Russian army to respect the dead if it is not capable of respecting human lives.”

Last week, it also said in a statement that people in Ukraine were being killed “purely because of insane pseudo-imperial megalomania.”

The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum also tweeted its outrage about Babyn Yar on Tuesday. And previously, it called out Putin for exploiting the Holocaust to invade Ukraine.

“In justifying this attack, Vladimir Putin has misrepresented and misappropriated Holocaust history by claiming falsely that democratic Ukraine needs to be ‘denazified,’” the museum said in a statement on Feb. 24. “Equally groundless and egregious are his claims that Ukrainian authorities are committing ‘genocide’ as a justification for the invasion of Ukraine.”

The White House said Zelenskyy and President Joe Biden spoke Tuesday about continued U.S. support for Ukraine. They discussed economic support, sanctions on Russia and the bombing near Babyn Yar.