SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: twmoore who wrote (184961)3/7/2022 9:44:35 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone2 Recommendations

Recommended By
frankl
marcher

  Respond to of 217549
 
The Big Question on Wall Street Is Which Banks Owe $41 Billion on Credit Default Swaps on Russia

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens
March 7, 2022

There is a known $41 billion in Credit Default Swaps (CDS) on Russian debt. There is likely many billions more in unknown amounts. There are also billions more in Credit Default Swaps on state-owned Russian corporate debt and non state-owned Russian corporate debt.

In addition to Wall Street not knowing which global banks and other financial institutions are on the hook to pay out on the Credit Default Swap protection they sold in case of a Russian sovereign debt default (or Russian corporate debt default), there is also approximately $100 billion of Russian sovereign debt (whose default is looking more and more likely) sitting on the balance sheets of foreign banks.

Put it all together and you have the makings of a replay of the 2008 banking crisis when banks backed away from lending to each other because they didn’t know who would fall next from toxic subprime exposure. That led to a liquidity crisis and the unprecedented involvement of the Federal Reserve secretly pumping trillions of dollars into the megabanks on Wall Street and their foreign derivative counterparties.

The cost of buying a five-year Credit Default Swap on Russian debt has spiked from 5 percent of the total value of the debt in early February to 46 percent last Friday to 58 percent this morning. The market has now priced in an 80 percent likelihood of default.

Russia’s debt was downgraded to junk status on February 25 by Standard and Poor’s. On March 3, Moody’s and Fitch downgraded the debt by six notches, also placing it in junk territory.

As the chart above indicates, the share prices of global banks with ties to Russia have been plunging since Russia began massive deployment of troops on the border of Ukraine and particularly since the invasion of Ukraine on February 24.

Reuters reported on February 28 that Citigroup has $10 billion in exposure to Russian loans and various other types of Russian exposure. Given Citigroup’s history of understating its subprime exposure during the financial crisis of 2008, that $10 billion may not be the whole story. On February 1, Citigroup closed the trading day at $66.56. It closed last Friday at $56.59 – a decline of 15 percent.

Citigroup’s commercial bank, Citibank, also has a significant commercial banking presence in Russia. Its website reports that it is “a key banking partner for about 3000 corporate clients including more than 600 global subsidiaries (virtually all of 500 Fortune companies), leading Russian companies and mid-sized clientele.” Its website notes further that it has branches servicing approximately 500,000 individual customers in 10 major cities in Russia, including: Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Samara, Sochi, Rostov-on-Don, Volgograd, Ufa and Kazan. Its operations center is located in Ryazan. The bank’s Russian website lists the following services to Russian clients: “…cash management, trade finance, investment banking, corporate finance, lending, FX [foreign exchange] and hedging services, securities services, issuer services and retail banking solutions, including wealth management, credit cards and personal loans.”

Interestingly, while a growing stream of famous brands like Hermes, Cartier, Nike, Apple, Ikea, Ford, Toyota, Disney, British Petroleum, Shell, ExxonMobil, FedEx, UPS, American Express, Mastercard and Visa (and numerous others) have announced they are closing stores, suspending services, or halting shipments to Russia – Citibank has made no announcement of closing its branches in Russia.

One of the largest foreign banks in Russia is Austria’s Raiffeisenbank (shown under the symbol RAIFY on the above chart). It closed at $7.35 on February 2, 2022 versus $3.20 last Friday – a decline of 56 percent in a little over a month’s time. Raiffeisenbank notes on its Russian website that it is “one of 13 systemically important banks in Russia,” that it ranks number 10 by assets and number 8 by the number of retail customers. Its regional network in Russia includes five branches and 116 outlets.

Another global foreign bank with large operations in Russia is the French global bank Societe Generale’s Rosbank (shown on the chart above under the symbol FR:GLE). According to its website, it has 5 million individual clients in Russia and 9,000 large corporate clients. Societe Generale’s share price closed at $33.33 on February 1 of this year. Last Friday, it closed at $20.80 – a decline of 38 percent.

Italy’s UniCredit also has large operations in Russia. Reuters reports that UniCredit’s Russian bank is the 12th largest bank in the country with 7.8 billion Euros in customer loans at the end of last year. Its shares are shown under the symbol IT:UCG on the above chart. Its shares closed at $14.25 on February 2 versus $9.00 last Friday – a decline of 37 percent.

Other global banks like JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Deutsche Bank (DB), Barclays (BCS) and Credit Suisse (CS), which have significant derivative exposures in general, have also experienced significant share price declines since Russia invaded Ukraine.

wallstreetonparade.com



To: twmoore who wrote (184961)3/29/2022 10:06:10 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217549
 
U.S. Natural Gas Production and LNG Exports amid Urgent Demand for LNG from Europe

by Wolf Richter • Mar 28, 2022 • 67 Comments

Biggest buyers of US LNG: South Korea, China, Japan, Brazil. But Mexico bought more US natural gas than all four combined.By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.There has been a lot of talk about the US supplying more liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe to replace a portion (a small portion) of pipeline natural gas from Russia. Tankers with US-produced LNG are already plying that route. But LNG export terminals along the Gulf Coast are running near capacity, and it takes time to build new liquefaction trains at existing export terminals and to build new export terminals and the pipeline infrastructure to supply them. So those ideas, as good as they may be, are getting complicated in a hurry.

The Status of US Natural Gas.The US is the largest consumer of natural gas in the world. For decades, natural gas production in the US wasn’t enough to meet demand, and so the US imported natural gas via pipeline from Canada, and via LNG from other countries. Fracking changed the equation, natural gas production began to soar, and along the way the US became the largest producer of natural gas in the world. In December, US natural gas production hit a record 118.8 billion cubic feet per day, according to EIA data:



As the price of natural gas in the US collapsed in 2008 amid surging production from fracking, the industry tried to find an outlet. Companies invested in building more pipelines to Mexico, and exports of pipeline natural gas to Mexico rose. And companies invested in large-scale LNG export terminals along the Gulf Coast, and LNG exports from the first of those terminals took off in 2016.

Total exports of natural gas via pipeline and LNG (red line) spiked by 26% in 2021 to a new record of 6.65 trillion cubic feet for the year. Total imports of natural gas, denoted by a negative number (purple line) has remained in the same range since 2013.



In 2017, the US became a “net exporter” of natural gas, exporting more natural gas to the rest of the world than it imported:



LNG imports essentially ceased, except during the coldest months in the winter in some New England regions that are not well connected via pipeline to producing regions in the US.

The Canada trade: The US exports natural gas to Canada and imports from Canada due to the regional pipeline infrastructure in place. About 30% of US pipeline exports go to Canada. On net, the US imports more from Canada than it exports to Canada.

The Mexico trade: The US does not import natural gas from Mexico; this is a one-way trade, with the US supplying Mexico with ever larger amounts of pipeline natural gas. About 70% of US natural gas pipeline exports go to Mexico.

Exports via LNG (red line) in 2021 exceeded pipeline exports (purple line) for the first time:



Here is our look at The Huge Ships for the Booming LNG Trade: Designs, Technologies, and Challenges for liquefied natural gas carriers.



US LNG exports by country.The list below shows the largest 25 recipient countries in 2021, in billion cubic feet per year, according to EIA data. South Korea has been the largest buyer of US natural gas. China has now surpassed Japan as the second largest buyer. China was a large buyer but in 2019 essentially stopped as part of the trade war, but recommenced in 2020. Brazil has emerged as the fourth largest buyer in 2021.

By comparison, in 2021, the US exported 2.16 trillion cubic feet of natural gas to Mexico via pipelines. This is about as much as the US exported in LNG to the top eight countries on this list combined.

Also note the European countries that bought US LNG in 2021.

US Export Volumes, by largest recipients in 2021, in billion cubic feet per year
201920202021
1South Korea270316453
2China7214450
3Japan201288355
4Brazil54112308
5Spain167200215
6India91124196
7United Kingdom118160195
8Turkey31124189
9Netherlands8186174
10France11890171
11Chile9081122
12Taiwan276499
13Argentina391583
14Portugal533766
15Poland383756
16Dominican Republic102653
17Pakistan273746
18Greece154840
19Bangladesh31138
20Croatia0336
21Kuwait101734
22Italy696834
23Lithuania32931
24Jamaica141725
25Singapore312825
In terms of the US as a bigger supplier of LNG to Europe, well, at the moment, there is not a lot of excess capacity left in the US to export more LNG to anywhere. Major additional LNG shipments from the US to Europe would largely be a shift away from other customers. LNG export capacity continues to be ramped up in the US, and even though it’s already in progress, it still takes time. And ramping up export capacity further than is already being planned will take even more time.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? Using ad blockers – I totally get why – but want to support the site? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how: