Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavidG who wrote (28040)	2/8/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: Richard Russell	Respond to of 53903

dddddd

To: DavidG who wrote (28040)	2/8/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

DavidG This brings us back to the J-CURVE ! Korea chips and Korea Kia cars have had it ! They need money to keep up ! They have poor quality ! ........................... At BX440 is there enough SDRAM ? .................................. Please note bears...that we are talking "speed" not 64Kbit ! ................................... So let's recap ! (1) Supply depends more on quality as SDRAM speed gets near 100Mhz which is going to be required when Intel goes to the BX440 this summer. (2) This is entirely different then 16Mbit going to 64Mbit (3) Quality issue ! (4) Die size ! (5) Testing capability of Micron.....and Japan and Korea !!! (6) Cost of production ! Micron the lowest ? (7) Yield !!!!! (8) Korea chopped by the J-CURVE (9) Having trouble figuring this all out ???? (10) Let MU do it all (g) (11) And just follow the MU trend (g) Larry Dudash PS: Thank God,I am just smart enough to know I am too dumb to do FA(g)

To: DavidG who wrote (28040)	2/8/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Jeff Leader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

Simple arithmetic tells us that 12 ns = 83.3 MHz. A reputable manufacturer would never put 12 ns SDRAM in a 100MHz system - even if it works MOST of the time. Just like they don't overclock the CPUs. Isn't Micron working on 133MHz SDRAM?