Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (759295)	3/14/2022 6:32:24 AM
From: skinowski	2 Recommendations Recommended By didjuneau i-node Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793761

>> He seems convinced that Biden is not being very helpful because he is counting on Putin to negotiate a deal with Iran. << On this one, Kasparov is not alone. Read recently about this - maybe Caroline Glick? - that Putin still serves as one of the key people working on the Iran deal. To many influential people this OneWorld business is a very high priority - and Iran, seemingly, is an important part of it. Putin, naturally, will want something in return for his cooperation. That “something” may be some degree if moderation on the part of the West. Which, in itself, is not necessarily a bad thing… if it helps the Ukraine negotiations and helps prevent a rapid slide to a Big War. Personally, I think OneWorld is a wrongheaded idea. It’s a form of global “equity” - equality of outcomes. This can be achieved either by having poor countries catch up with the rich ones - or, through some sort of redistribution. Since socialists have never been known for being patient, it would probably be the latter.