Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACCY - Accsys Global Network, Inc (NASDAQ OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (1068)	2/9/1998 1:23:00 AM
From: flightlessbird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574

Andrew: I can only reiterate what I have said about my knowledge of the float. 10M are restricted leaving the float somewhere between 0 and 6.7M shares (based on 16.7M outstanding). Based on my memory of conversations about this with Damian, I recall that ACCY insiders own 3-4M of the 6.7M unrestricted shares. The issue at this point is only how many shares of accy have been sold by insiders. Assuming none, I would estimate the float at 3-4M (as I have always estimated it). According to John Stewart's information, they are not selling any shares. I can't verify that personally. So I estimate the float at somewhere between 3 and 6.7 million shares, and probably much closer to 3. I don't believe shares were dumped on the market during this recent upswing because it is hard to believe a stock could move 250% with shares being dumped. I do believe Damian and David believe in their concept and company and would not be selling their shares at this level. I have always operated under an assumption of 3-4M shares in the float. Personally, if the number was closer to 5, I could care less. I don't think the difference will have a great impact as we near tournament time. Obviously it didn't make much of a difference in the past week. I agree that certain people have promulgated incorrect information regarding the float. 2M shares is inaccurate and, in fact, if I am remembering correctly, even I originally believed that to be the case. But that was before I did my due diligence and ultimately uncovered the correct number. Flightlessbird (feathers ruffled and all gg)

To: Andrew H who wrote (1068)	2/9/1998 3:34:00 AM
From: Bisset	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574

Hi Andrew... you're correct. It was pretty dumb of me to become embroiled in all this. Illegal? Actually no, as an ex-director, basically my debt to society has been paid. In short, I can pretty much say anything that you could, save for "insider" info. Should I? Nope, probably not, given the last twenty threads or so. I was merely trying to shed a little knowledge on some unanswered questions. Understand that I personally know the people involved, and so would stand up for them in the light of controversy. Will the company be successful? I believe so, and have stated facts supporting my opinion. The rest is for you and the others to work out. Why did I use my father-in-law's account? Cause I'm too cheap to pay for my own. Will I ever again post to this thread? Probably not... but if I do, you can rest assured it will be under my own name. I have posted privately to a few, but it really is just a reiteration of this last thread. Regards, B. D. Bisset PS - If I was trying to hype this issue, I'm fairly sure I would have been fired for providing such poor results. Good luck to all in your endeavors.