Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rzborusa who wrote (1350249)	3/24/2022 1:21:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576346

Borusa, you claimed that Gelsinger was in charge of Intel's grand plans to "hIjAcK tHe mArKeT" with Itanium. But Gelsinger was smart enough to relegate Itanium to the niche well before it had any further impact on Intel's rise in the data center. Maybe you didn't get the memo, Intel has renamed their 10nm process to SEVEN. Not seven nm, just Seven. I don't even know if it is a number or a name. LOL indeed. The point is that Intel is NOT "four manufacturing nodes behind" TSMC. Maybe one or two steps behind, but with the flattening of Moore's Law, that's not that big of a difference. Thanks, I do have a set. I'm sure you do, but it doesn't take any cajones to make dumbass claims like "Intel fans want China to take over Taiwan." I for one believe that Intel can and will succeed by competing in the free market of semiconductors. Gelsinger doesn't need TSMC to go up in a mushroom cloud. You obviously don't think so, and that Intel is bad bad bad like Omicron Jinping. Tenchusatsu