Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (185914)	4/2/2022 4:07:48 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By Secret_Agent_Man Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220195

Re << TJ I wonder how come we have very similar breakfast menus and differ on other issues >> … because the breakfast menu featured is a good idea? :0) Re << … real estate … or any other basket of commodities and you will discover it is lagging >> My suspicion is that gold shall catch up even as the … for example … real estate … shall do the opposite of up, meaning down, due to a combination of officialdom intervention by taxation, and by social network adoption, that which for NY would be limited, and for gold, global. As to neon, lithium, xenon, etc, the stock-to-flow characteristic is all-wrong for them to serve as money, unless they are explicitly made into money, which is unrealistic because they are actually useful. The more the commodities inflate against current monies, the more the social network adoption should favor immutable variant of monies, a guess, and in such a process, the arguably original money, gold, and neo money, bitcoins, as the two are compared against the rest. I make a distinction between ‘money’ and ‘asset’ even as certain ‘monies’ also happen to be asset.