Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (761021)	4/11/2022 7:06:10 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793735

Starting to sound like one of those gloom and doom Global Warming is going to kill us all. Should the world be driven by who has the biggest gun and is crazy enough to make others think he will use it? If so, the free world may as well lie down today and say to Putin, it’s all yours, be our master. Follow the money, it’s about oil, gas, water, land and rare earth minerals. Russia wants them and the KGB agent is fooling some that’s it’s about NATO and Russian historical nonsense. They had to act now, with the feckless fool in the White House, as the risk was too high Trump might return to the Oval Office and put and end to their dream of trillions in wealth. Here’s a good interview -enjoy!

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (761021)	4/12/2022 9:40:56 AM
From: skinowski	Respond to of 793735

The models are eerily specific. In the 4,400 warhead/150 Tg soot nuclear war scenario, averaged over the subsequent five years, China sees a reduction in food calories of 97.2 percent, France by 97.5 percent, Russia by 99.7 percent, the UK by 99.5 percent and the US by 98.9 percent. In all these countries, virtually everyone who survived the initial blasts would subsequently starve. MAD Devil is in the details. A Russian guy living in Vladivostok receives a reply - among other things, what would happen if Russia and the US have a nuclear exchange - and use 50% of their available warheads. A nuclear winter when the survivors will envy the dead. Even far smaller exchanges would be horrific. It's pretty grim. Modelling of a nuclear exchange between Russia and the US suggests >90% death of global population, mostly through famine and nuclear winter. https://t.co/IUAl00se6H — Mac Hamilton 🇺🇦 (@maks_amillion) April 12, 2022