SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (186606)4/19/2022 11:12:27 PM
From: TobagoJack5 Recommendations

Recommended By
dvdw©
fred woodall
maceng2
Secret_Agent_Man
sense

  Respond to of 217648
 
(3) I listened to the pod cast and and encourage a read of the transcript.

Spoiler: GetMoreGoldNow, for gold going to 3,000 and over, because it is the only LT asset that can keep track of energy inflation, the inflation that China and India MUST pay. and KEEP PAYING.


Simplicity = NEEDs
Complication = Choices of options


EU believes it has Choices of options
China and India believes they have NEEDs



The choice bits
















To: sense who wrote (186606)4/19/2022 11:28:08 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217648
 
(6) Shall think this day whilst doing walks

... about Gold, US$, Yen and the state of is

On the one hand ... the famous cup-&-handle of Gold / US$, that allows the US$-denominated goldbug to score 5.5% per annum return over the past 30 years



... is not there when we frame the picture in Gold / Yen. Do not know but Japan has finally done 'it' to the yen with great success, allowing the Japanese gold bug to score 6.3% per annum return over the past 30 years.

Japan bugs win :0)



OTOH

bloomberg.com

Traders Need to Rethink Tumbling Yen as a Carry Funding Favorite

Swiss, Taiwanese currencies may be better carry-trade funders Implied yields favor Swiss franc over yen as one metric

Chikako Mogi20 April 2022, 05:55 GMT+8

Carry traders would do well to take a second look at funding favorite the yen -- as even at a 20-year low there are better sources to fund the purchase of higher-yielding currencies.

On the surface the yen looks like the perfect well for carry traders to dip into, under pressure from a Bank of Japan determined to keep local yields anchored to the floor even as interest rates around the world push higher. But despite consensus building for further losses -- peers look like better funding options on certain key metrics.

That’s the upshot of a Bloomberg analysis of an array of funding currencies, which shows investors may be better off considering the Swiss franc, Taiwan dollar and euro rather than the rapidly weakening yen. These offer a mix of lower implied yields and volatility -- hallmarks of a desired funding source for carry traders -- who borrow to buy higher-yielding currencies to earn returns.

The findings suggest demand to sell the yen for carry purposes may wane, easing pressure on the beleaguered currency, should investors opt for the more attractive alternatives.

“The yen doesn’t look like the carry funding currency it once was,” said Yuji Kameoka, chief foreign-exchange strategist at Daiwa Asset Management Co. in Tokyo.



Source: Bloomberg

Carry trades have been a bright spot in a volatile market for rates strategies this year, the Bloomberg GSAM FX Carry Index has climbed 6%, led by stellar returnsin Brazil among others. Conversely, a gauge of the global bond market has fallen over 9% -- set for its biggest loss on record.

An investor eyeing the near 20% surge in the Brazilian real against the dollar -- a 34% rise versus the yen -- would naturally consider the latter to be the optimal funder.

But take yields, in this case three-month implied ones from the currency forward market. While the yen offers a yield of minus 0.4%, the Swiss franc is more attractive from a funding point of view at minus 0.9%, as is the Taiwan dollar at minus 1.6%.

“The Swiss franc feels like a better choice than the yen” as far as yields are concerned, said Kiyoshi Ishigane, chief fund manager at Mitsubishi UFJ Kokusai Asset Management Co. in Tokyo. With its extended decline “the question is if it’s profitable to do carry trades with the yen.”



The yen extended its longest losing streak in at least half a century Tuesday as traders looked through government warnings about the speed of the currency’s decline, focusing instead on the widening gap between Japanese and U.S. interest rates.

Officials are facing a tough battle to slow moves in the currency as the stark contrast between policies of the BOJ and Federal Reserve invites a wave of betson the yen weakening further.

While the policy difference adds to its appeal as a funding source, implied volatility acts as a counterweight. Meanwhile, the Swiss franc burnishes its appeal with limited upside seen from investors, while the euro stands out for its higher liquidity.

Methodology

The analysis of relative attractiveness of the carry-trade funding currencies was based on five factors including implied yields and volatility. The output for each is an adjusted Z-score -- which measures them relative to the other currencies -- where a higher value points to a more attractive trait as a funding source.

YieldVolatilityMonetary

Policy

Expected

Change in Spot

LiquidityTotal
Swiss franc0.560.690.660.63-0.631.91
Taiwan dollar1.41.020.46-0.48-0.761.63
Euro0.370.270.42-0.650.260.67
U.S. dollar-1.870.17-2.191.952.090.15
Yen-0.17-0.040.63-0.95-0.24-0.77
Swedish krona-0.28-2.10.01-0.51-0.72-3.6

— With assistance by Hiroko Komiya



To: sense who wrote (186606)4/20/2022 5:03:55 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217648
 
am wondering what, if anything $185 black-gold would do to the shares of black-gold miners?

... and to the French election involving all those truck drivers and tractor users?

Will EU constituent domains swing draftily left extremely right?

zerohedge.com

EU To Impose Full Embargo On Russian Oil Next Week, Will Send Price Above $185 According To JPMorgan

Update (13:15 ET): What was largely a theoretical modeling exercise until moments ago, is set to go live because Reuters reports that the EU is set to declare a full embargo on Russian oil after this weekend's French election:

EU GAS PRICE TO SHOOT UP AS EU TO DECLARE EMBARGO ON RUSSIAN OIL AFTER FRENCH ELECTION NEXT WEEK - SOURCE

Why wait until after the election to launch the embargo? Simple: Europe's bureaucrats are correctly terrified that the coming oil price spike to push the vote in Le Pen's favor, which is why Europe will wait until after the election (when Macron will supposedly be the next president of France, as Belgium hopes) to announce it publicly.

More below (and in the full JPM report available to pro subs).

* * *

Despite the clear intentions of western government to cripple Russian energy production, loadings of Russian oil have so far been surprisingly resilient, so much so that Russia's current account balance is at all time highs.

[url=][/url]

According to JPMorgan, shipments in the seven days to April 16 hit 7.3 mbd, only 330 kbd below the 7.58 mbd averaged in February before the start of the war. Remarkably, JPM calculates that Russian crude exports are averaging 360 kbd above pre-invasion volumes, while exports of oil products like fuel oil, naphtha, and VGO have declined by 700 kbd (full report available to pro subscribers in the usual place).

[url=][/url]

As previously observed, the decline in product exports combined with a 200 kbd drop in Russian domestic oil demand has resulted in Russian refineries cutting runs. The volume of refining cuts in April has risen to 1.3 mbd, almost 0.6 mbd above usual April maintenance. By late March, a sharp reduction in domestic refining throughput triggered production shut-ins.

With that in mind, JPM now estimates that Russian production shut-ins will amount to 1.5 mbd in April, vs its initial forecast of 2 mbd (the forecast of a 1 mbd loss of Russian exports for the rest of the year remains unchanged for now).

Underlying JPM's projection is the assumption that European buyers will cut their purchases of Russian oil by about 2.0-2.5 mbd by the end of the year and that Russia will be able to re-route only about 1 mbd out of that.

The three ways JPM gets to its 2.0-2.5 mbd estimate are:

Russian crude spot contracts account for about 1.8 mbd of total exports, while about 0.3 mbd of products are sold on spot terms, giving us a likely disruption of 2.1 mbd,As of today, nine European countries plus the US, Canada and the UK have committed to cut their imports of Russian oil by ~2.1 mbd,26 major European refiners and trading companies have suspended spot purchases or intend to phase out 2.1 mbd of Russian imports.[url=][/url]

Of course, it will come as no surprise to anyone that aggressive purchases of Russian oil by China and India - who have both ramped up purchases of Russian oil in the past two months, and Turkey has also increased volumes to pre-COVID levels - have offset some of the loss. Given time, JPM estimates that together these three countries can likely import an additional 1 mbd beyond what they are importing today.

Which brings us to the big question: if Europe follows through on its warning to expand sanctions to all Russian oil, what happens to the price? Well, according to JPMorgan, nothing good.

As JPM's commodity strategist Natasha Kaneva writes, she has reviewed various scenarios should Europe expand its sanctions to include Russian oil, and warns that "any immediate embargo measure taken by the European Commission will have a severe impact on the global oil market with risks to price entirely to the upside in the short-term."

The bank has examined three potential tools the EU could use to sanction Russian oil, from the most aggressive, a full embargo on imports from Russia, to the more conservative, taxes or price caps on Russia oil imports. In any scenario, to avoid the extreme price spikes, the market needs time to adjust.

A look at the various scenarios, starting with the most draconian:

A full and immediate embargo is likely to hurt European consumers more than Russian producers in the near term. More importantly, a full, immediate ban would likely drive Brent crude oil prices to $185/bbl as more than 4 mbd of Russian oil supplies would be displaced with neither room nor time to re-route them to China, India, or other potential substitute buyers.Some more details on the "full embargo" scenario:

Though India has already increased its imports of Russian oil to three times 2021 levels, its ability to continue to act as a sink for displaced Russian oil supply remains in question as the US warns India not to increase imports further.

However, if Europe implements an embargo more slowly, e.g. over a period of months, similar to the European ban on Russian coal imports where a wind-down period of four months is in place, prices are unlikely to rise much higher than current levels.In a slower phase out, Russia would have more time to adjust its oil flows toward friendlier buyers and global ex-OPEC+ supply growth would have time to grow sufficiently to fill at least some of the Russia-sized hole in global oil supply.The EU is also entertaining less drastic alternatives to a full embargo which would allow Europe to continue to receive Russian oil supply while still applying financial pressure on Moscow. These alternatives include introducing i) special taxes and ii) price caps on European imports of Russian oil.

Because the operational breakevens for Russian oil are less than $10/bbl and Russia’s Energy Minister has said the country will sell to “friendly countries” at “any price range,” Russian producers could likely still afford to continue to deliver oil to European consumers, even under tariffs of 90% or a price cap of $20/bbl. Either of these options may provide a politically-acceptable middle ground, allowing the EU to make a show of force while maintaining its Russian energy lifeline

Additionally, under a price cap, the EU is considering establishing an escrow account into which oil buyers would deposit the difference between the market price of oil and the level of the price cap. These funds would either be entirely dedicated to rebuilding Ukraine after hostilities cease or be provided to Russian producers at a later date net of costs to rebuild Ukraine. Sending additional funds to Russian operators, even at a later date, likely carries with it political risk, but the promise of more revenue in the future would go further to guarantee continued supply from Russia.
In any of these scenarios, it is obvious that Russia will turn to friendlier buyers for its exports of crude oil and oil products. China and India have both already ramped up purchases of Russian oil in the past two months and Turkey has also continued to ramp up purchases of Russian oil toward pre-COVID levels in spite of the conflict in Ukraine.

Together, these three countries can likely import an additional 1 mbd beyond what they are importing today, with China replacing other East Asia buyers of oil from Eastern Russia like Japan and Korea and Turkey and India picking up cargoes of Russian oil from the Black Sea and Baltic ports opportunistically.

[url=][/url]



To: sense who wrote (186606)4/20/2022 5:36:00 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217648
 
185$ oil would wobble constructs, a guess