SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (186649)4/20/2022 8:37:30 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Secret_Agent_Man

  Respond to of 217662
 
If, and a big if, this below article is representative of the calibre of thinking by folks who matter w/r to Russian gold and sanctions targeting Russia, then I worry that they might be proven quite wrong, thinking that any Russian gold is looking for cracks in the sanction regime to be transacted outside of Russia.

Gold, when push come to shove, is not meant for transactions, but for HODLing investopedia.com

If Russia is not intending to transact its own gold, but to swap its energy for gold, and just vacuum up all movable gold from unfriendly nations, then ... well, I don't know, as it sort of depends on the relative as well as absolute S2F (stock to flow) of unfriendly gold and demure Russian energy, and minerals, and and and

Unclear driving Russia to gold barter system is necessarily a good idea until shown otherwise. Shall do back of envelop by and by.

Am almost sure that the financial / monetary sanctions tee-ed up against Russia were angles the winging-it politicians drummed up in desperation for need to look as if they are doing something, anything, in a situation they do not wish to be splashed by. Winging it works in movies and poker. In real life against chess players, not so much.

OTOH, Team Germany says it is going to remain unfriendly and will not fork over its gold for Russian energy, and so we have the setting for drama rt.com



gtreview.com

Russian sanctions likely to boost illicit gold trade, researchers warn
April 22, 2022
John Basquill

Sanctioned Russian entities are likely to turn to illicit gold trading as a means of moving funds across international borders, leaving banks at risk if they fail to tighten controls, experts are warning.
US and Europe-led sanctions on Russia have targeted both wealthy individuals and private sector companies, meaning their ability to generate income, move funds and access foreign exchange is “greatly restricted”, according to a report published last week by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC).

GI-TOC, an international network of organised crime experts, says those entities are now expected to turn to the “well oiled” wheels of the illicit gold market, exploiting both established trade corridors and underground criminal systems to retain their access to wealth.

“Gold can be physically moved around the world outside of digital financial networks, including SWIFT financial messaging, making it difficult to track. Gold is also easily laundered in global markets through not declaring or disguising its origins,” the report says.

“Moscow could use foreign exchange reserves accessed through illicit gold markets for imports, to fund Russian military operations or to compensate sanctioned Russian oligarchs for their losses. Separate from Moscow, other sanctioned actors may also make use of criminal networks to launder and smuggle gold.”

Russia has bolstered its gold reserves significantly since its annexation of Crimea in 2014, which prompted EU and US-led sanctions that pushed the country into a financial crisis.

However, following its invasion of Ukraine in February, fresh restrictions have been introduced that would likely affect the movement of gold, including the imposition of sanctions from four major gold trading markets: the US, UK, Switzerland and Singapore.

The UK was by far the largest import market for gold from Russia in 2020, with buyers purchasing nearly US$17bn-worth, yet government guidance has confirmed that UK entities are now explicitly forbidden from engaging in gold transactions with the Central Bank of Russia. The US Treasury Department has also confirmed its restrictions apply to gold.

As a result, GI-TOC warns that Russian entities may seek to move wealth by disguising its origin and the beneficiaries of trade transactions, for instance by exporting gold via a friendly country.

“There are some reports of Russian actors transferring assets to gold and physically moving assets to jurisdictions that are perceived to be safe havens,” it says.

This trend means financial institutions, including trade finance lenders, could be inadvertently exposed to illicit gold through seemingly legitimate trade transactions.



Safe havens

The GI-TOC report says Russian entities are theoretically able to access gold markets in countries that have not imposed sanctions, such as China.

However, it notes that many entities are wary of secondary sanctions risks from facilitating Russia-linked trade, as well as barriers in accessing US dollars or the Swift financial messaging system, and so will voluntarily avoid Russian-origin goods.

At the same time, numerous institutions have chosen to cut ties with Russian companies, including state banks in China, and lenders in India and the Middle East, to avoid potential reputational damage.

“This is where criminal networks have a role to play,” the report says. “Sanctioned entities… can evade these restrictions if they engage in gold and money laundering to disguise the origins of the gold and the beneficiaries of gold profits.”

Typically, this process involves source and transit countries with weak regulatory oversight, GI-TOC warns.

The report identifies India as a “major gold smuggling hub”, citing research by Geneva-based think tank Impact Initiatives. It says weak due diligence on gold imports, including refined bullion, allow crucial documentation to be falsified, while goldsmiths have been known to “turn a blind eye” to questionable information.

Similarly, GI-TOC says it would be “difficult to track” gold smuggling between Russia and China, as well as potential further movements into Hong Kong and India.

The UAE has also previously been identified as a hotspot for high-risk activity, including trading of gold originating from conflict zones, due to lax disclosure requirements on origin and transit countries.

Expert analysis of 2016 trade data suggests that at least 46% of the UAE’s gold supply came from nations that would be red-flagged under OECD rules if their country of origin had been recorded by officials.

Elsewhere, Turkey has imported gold worth billions of dollars from Iraq, which the report says could be used as a transit country for Russian gold, and has been linked with sanctions evasion via gold trading with Venezuela and Iran.

GI-TOC also says Russia’s growing influence in Africa – including through Russian ownership of gold mines and local operations involving Russian companies – could present other potential trade routes for illicit cargoes.



The threat to banks

Criminal attempts to circumvent restrictions “by resorting to the transfer of property to other destinations including the UAE, India and China” present an enforcement risk to banks, says Michael Ruck, a partner in K&L Gates’ investigations and enforcement practice.

“The transfer of gold and other precious metals requires close consideration as it is a criminal offence to facilitate or aid the circumvention of various sanctions regimes,” Ruck tells GTR.

Lakshmi Kumar, policy director at Global Financial Integrity – a non-profit research organisation that advises governments on illicit fund flows – says banks should look beyond the stated origin of gold if facilitating transactions.

Checking production numbers and export data can give clues as to whether origins have been faked, Kumar tells GTR. “This is relevant both in the context of Russian sanctions and conflict gold,” she says.

Due diligence of the entities involved in a transaction is “critical”, including whether they have any involvement in the gold sector in jurisdictions vulnerable to money laundering or illicit trade.

“Financial institutions should reassess their risk profile and exposure to the gold sector as a whole in the wake of the sanctions,” Kumar adds. “Trade finance and compliance teams should not be siloed and should work together to develop specific red flags.”

Russia’s build-up of gold reserves has long been characterised as an attempt to bolster resilience to sanctions, particularly by decreasing reliance on the US dollar.

Russia’s gold reserves have more than doubled since its annexation of Crimea in 2014, GI-TOC finds, based on an analysis of Central Bank data.

The report says the proportion of Central Bank reserves held in gold has also increased during that time, from 8.9% in March 2014 to 21.7% by June 2021. US dollars no longer make up the largest share of those reserves, falling from 39.4% to 16.4% over the same period.



To: sense who wrote (186649)4/21/2022 1:22:51 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217662
 
I cite some opinion flows. If 185 oil does not ring your bell, then perhaps 230 oil grabs you by the bits

ask-socrates.com

Blog

Crude oil has the standard Uptrend Channel which projects resistance at the $130 level. Interestingly enough, the high here in 2022 so far has been $130.50. I have been rather upset about the geopolitical ramifications that are taking place. I have explained how Hillary, a Neocon, some say has a double edge sword. One side is what the girls in the office called a Feminine Nazi which she just hates the fact that she is a woman with a desire for power. The other side of this sword seems to be her love of war. Some say that such hard-as-nails lesbians are far worse than men because they feel they have to prove themselves. Whatever the explanation, Hillary was involved in trying to create revolutions in Syria and Libya which was the whole Benghazi Affair. She was cheering the attack on Iraq. Now she is pushing for the whole outright war against Russia. She thinks the US can win by using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder to weaken Russia as was the case with the US supplying arms to the Taliban to defeat Russia in Afghanistan.



Our models on Crude showed that the volatility would start here in 2022 and continue into 2029. There is clearly a risk that we will see a burst of geopolitical events in 2023 and once Crude gets through the standard Upotrend Channel, we could see even $230 as soon as 2023. The Panic Cycle in 2025 aligns with global war and the volatility trend rises sharply into the Agenda 2030 promoted by Klaus Schwab who history will probably remember alongside Karl Marx.

Between this Climate Change Agenda to end fossil fuels before there is any viable alternative and this deliberate move to try to force the surrender of China and Russia to comply with this new one-world government and Agenda 2030, the future we are leaving our children is far from better than what we experienced. All I can do is try to expose their agenda and perhaps if enough people wake up to see the real threat to civilization has been the takeover of our governments by the World Economic Forum, just maybe we can lessen the amplitude of the cycle into 2032 and learn from our mistakes in reforming government post-2032.