Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186877)	4/23/2022 6:54:54 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219522

You might be correct. I can see the logic underlying your post. I read it from start to finish’ With regard to Meanwhile, it's uncertain that China particularly wants peace in Ukraine. While the war continues, Russia becomes more and more dependent on China. So China doesn't necessarily want Russia to win and the war to stop. Maybe some sanctions by China on Russia might kill two birds with one stone = weaken Russia further, stopping it from winning, making it beg China for support and agreeing to swap Siberia for agreeing to buy methane from Russia. While the war in Ukraine continues, China could keep buying more and more and more of Siberia until it owns all the way to the Urals and what the heck, why not to the border of Hungary and Norway? Americans are certainly short-sighted. Boris and Euroserfs will soon be reporting to Saudi Arabia's Koran quoters. China is back! Americans should immediately call a truce, say sorry to Vlad and agree to put Russia in NATO and start shipping resources west instead of east. Exxon could start oil and gas exploration and production, mining and whatnot in Siberia. Heck, even sell some to China. Unclear to me that Team Russia, willing to risk planetary nuclear war in view of arguable existential crisis involving Ukraine, would uncharacteristically go easy on ceding Siberia involving China. What do you think? I doubt the age old wish by Poland to see Chinese troops on their border in the absence of Russian troops would happen. If my suspicion is borne out, yes, likely better and even best to free-trade Siberian goodies for RMB as opposed to dollars and euros that Russia is not allowed to spend, and best to remain friendly with Russia so that the goodies traded does not necessitate the transfer of gold, even if at Rouble 5000 per (gram?) something. Should there be actual danger of secondary sanctions by Team USA for free-trade with Russia, that makes Team China choose to feed and house Chinese or be denuded of USA / Nato markets for vacuum cleaners and plastic flowers, then cross that bridge when at the bridge Let’s see Teams USA / Nato choose MoreInflationNow and risk social cohesion Let’s watch Germany and France and see how they choose France tee-ed up for Sunday (today) choosing Recommendations: GetMoreGoldNow, for hoarding as proof-of-work goodness, and GetSomeCryptoNow, for transfers that might be required within a 36 months planning horizon

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186877)	4/23/2022 11:32:59 PM
From: Arran Yuan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219522

Mr. Winn, you've proposed such a big task that no one on the stage could think of and about, let alone could handle?