Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (186916)	4/25/2022 10:33:30 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By Secret_Agent_Man Respond to of 219078

Not thinking he's remotely close, either, in relation Swift limts/ sanctions... "This has provided the incentive for China's alternative system thereby dividing the world economy and bringing to end globalization". Clearly not wrong in sanctions fostering many in having second thoughts re reconsidering dollar holdings as reserves... But, China's alternative... is not what is "driving" division... as that's all coming from Biden's choices... if maybe with a bit of a very corrupt Biden being captured and held deep in Xi's pocket... And, none of it has much to do with "ending globalization" directly ? It is the globalists who are seeking to destroy the dollar... in order to take the power and control associated with its current role for themselves... without having to worry about any details like legitimacy or elections... They likely are willing cooperators with China... in fostering division and destruction... as can without risk... But, then... globalism's path necessarily evolves into... what was that old TV show... "there can be only one"... Oh, yeah " The Highlander"...which of course is fiction... as in reality any scheme like that consists of maximizing the "divide and conquer" concept all the way down to the fundamental unit of society... expecting individual competitors are always going to be willing to subject themselves to competition with your chosen champion one at a time... Similar issues in China and Russia both... trying to intimidate neighbors into bilateral relationships to prevent the emergence of "NATO in the Pacific"... or expansion of NATO as the most obviously rational reaction to Russia attacking its smaller and less powerful neighbors... With China and Russia both overtly seeking to expand empires of their own... The still limited competition with the dollar, thus far, is not without obvious ambition.... but it is hardly "ending" globalization... rather than diversifying the options... while handicapping the competition... as it is continuing to seek to impose one world government... seeking to impose control over the money first... and clearly preferring those options they can enable for doing so without accepting the sorts of limits that come appended to the limits of Constitutional government. But, that doesn't mean they intend to submit to become servants of Xi or his successors... rather than their masters... I suspect globalism is doomed in any case... Not least because it intends to imposed "banking" as an expanded top layer in usurping our governance... when the reality in the real world... is that the utility of banking is defunct... making it as rational to tolerate that... as would be thinking that the end of the era of horse drawn buggys... would naturally have us appointing the operators of buggy whip manufacturers as the natural rulers of the world... That it is cartoonishly ridiculous in its ambition... doesn't make it more likely to succeed than the bad guys in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" ?