Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (761977)	4/26/2022 12:15:43 AM
From: carranza2	6 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee D. Long didjuneau FJB isopatch and 1 more member Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793890

Such an easy case to prove, even without the allegedly privileged documents. Sussmann’s billing records show that he billed the Hillary for America campaign for drafting the white paper he pimped to Baker as a “concerned citizen.” See paragraphs 24 and 26 of the indictment. Hell’s bells, he was working on it just a few days before he met with Baker! justice.gov Baker, who now works for Lawfare after getting booted out of the FBI, surely knew Sussmann was, wink, wink, bulls****ng him, but he was a willing victim. Baker, of course, can’t possibly claim that he knew Sussmann was working for Hillary because he would get his ass in a Mixmaster if he did. He has to say he believed Sussmann’s BS, which should seal Sussman’s fate. That should do it. Easy, peasy case to try. Don’t understand the delay, the complexity, etc. A jury can understand it very easily. The greedy shit thought he could bill Hillary and claim he was a “concerned citizen” doing God’s work at the same time. Lol!