SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (761996)4/26/2022 3:33:49 PM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 793759
 
The fish he catches are likely to be charged for process crimes for lying in statements during the investigation, IMO. Proving and charging the conspiracy is going to eat up too much time and the statutes will run, though he seems to have put the puzzle together by the looks of the allegations in the filings.



To: carranza2 who wrote (761996)4/26/2022 5:13:12 PM
From: golfer725 Recommendations

Recommended By
Hank Scorpio
Hugh Bett
isopatch
pak73
steve harris

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
Nothing of substance will come out of Durham's investigation. They will run out the clock



To: carranza2 who wrote (761996)4/26/2022 6:13:30 PM
From: SirWalterRalegh2 Recommendations

Recommended By
isopatch
pak73

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793759
 
But he'd better hurry if he intends to do so because the statute(s) of limitations are running.

Is it not true that if there is a conspiracy there is no statue of limitations?
A participate has extricate themselves from the conspiracy to allow the start of statue oflimitations to begin.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News