Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (187055)	4/26/2022 9:57:09 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217774

while arguably EU motion towards nuclear-dom is correct Message 33818543 Europe’s plans may alleviate some of the shortfall, but the continent needs to face the reality of belt-tightening on the demand side. Barring that, go nuclear! the detail be that whether the -dom to be self erected or supplied by Russia Russia Russia In the meantime am guessing that boycotting China China China w/r to solar might not be astute. just a guess.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (187055)	4/27/2022 11:33:51 PM
From: sense	3 Recommendations Recommended By Maurice Winn Roads End SirWalterRalegh Respond to of 217774

The Climate Emergency people must be pleased with less CO2 though they selfishly ignore... that not everyone benefits from ending our still ongoing emergence from the prior ice age... and plunging us back into another one... CO2 is just a gaseous form of plant food... so their efforts are an attack on plant life... farmers... and anyone who like to eat food grown at a lower cost... They should really be called "brown" (shirts) and not "green" advocates... ? I'm not "anti-environmentalist"... I'm just more specifically pro-plant... and no one is advocating for them...