Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (187121)	4/28/2022 12:25:15 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maurice Winn Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217789

All seems far too predictable to generate any real "surprise"... as far as coal... or oil and gas ? But, have seen it playing out now over a long period of time... in which the "green" effort imposing "social distancing" from coal... has suppressed prices... and limited future supply... in spite of no shortage of supply... without delivering any real benefit ? Coal reality is instructive in relation to "shortages" in other energy spaces... all driven by "choice" and not any limits in reality... other than those that have been selected to create as artificial "carve outs" to transfer value... to the chosen alternative... with no real economic or "environmental" benefit... just a transfer scheme. Sprott's cornering of the uranium market... a brilliant counter... but, not one able to duplicate in other energy markets... although, one might be tempted to ask... if Sprott can do that in uranium, and improve market functions to enable access to larger value... why not the same thing in silver... other metals... at a time when others are working at the opposite... in destroying liquidity and markets... ? Nickel, as a "small" market... might be ready for that sort of dis-aggregated yet better focused competition ? That commodities trade in centralized markets... where more easily exposed to manipulation... rather than hoving off as decentralized functions... with enhanced focus on a specific concern... seems a defi issue technology clearly enables... But... function is tied to... functional choices... that are not about "control" but adaptations that are more functional as a shared benefit to all who participate... which Sprott gets... and apparently no one else in the world of "finance" is able to understand... that delivering value... rather than taking it... is a necessary function ? And, thus... the LME is failing... and the COMEX is failing... and... markets are failing... because failure to surrender "fraud and takings" as the purpose of markets... And, now we're talking about "money"... instead of coal... or energy... or "just" commodities ? Hmmm. So, is it the point "to go green"... or a subterfuge to lower prices now... and enable "a trade" at lows... before reversing the game play... ? Or, is the fraud engaged less simple... intending transfers to be sustained through force... in spite of them imposing impossible inefficiencies... as we see imposed in energy in Europe? Otherwise, also predictable, that "going green" as it encounters a physical reality with "actual" real limits imposed by reality, instead of those fictions crafted for narrow purpose enabling a subterfuge to mask overt "takings"... will impose opposite as intended effects... as reality reasserts itself... as it is doing now... by forcing the rapid ramp in the use of coal... rather than "better choices" from their own perspective... that clearly could have been made ? It's all and only about the $... and the advantage in money obtained by the few through fraud... rather than by honest labors...