Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sense who wrote (187191)	4/30/2022 2:15:38 PM
From: maceng2	3 Recommendations Recommended By fred woodall marcher sense Respond to of 217752

<<RF Pollution>> ? RF causing Climate Change is a nice one to suggest to younger scientists today. I like it. -g- Don't know if you have seen these videos I have posted before. The Utube links have gone on the old posts, but they have sprang up elsewhere. Yeah could be some stealth censorship going on. Quick intro to too much of the electromagnetic spectrum. The Dancing Aphids These videos are a little dated, but as relevant as ever imho. Safety issues. 5G - A Real Terror see:- Tom Wheeler 1 min and 10 seconds above. The guy is a frigging loonie and people think its OK. I watched all of "Better call Saul" mentioned in the video. Enjoyed the series, especially the tin foil hat stuff. I thought the tin foil hat stuff would inspire useful debate and curiosity, but I may live in a different universe than a lot of "normal" folks. -g- This video below is educational and gives some amazing historical science. A real stumper. Resonance Beings of Frequency HD If anyone thinks Human Beings have new technologies under control, the following BBC documentaries might temper the enthusiasm. If anything, we need to be super keen on safety studies, besides being a little cautious. Not sure if you can get these links, you might be able to find elsewhere using the title as a search item. Hidden killers throughout the ages. BBC. youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com As a child I had several Chemistry sets listed among the labeled killers. There were loads of other risks too. Being slightly lucky I survived them. A safety evaluation and risk analysis before doing anything was learned very early on, when I was less than 10 years of age.. Fear inspires, and I would even seek advice as best I could at the time. Forget parental supervision, they would have died of fright many times over. This was way before the internet. . A safety and risk analysis now aged 60 years plus says 5G, WiFi and RF in general needs some further safety evaluation and the data published..A lot of necessary safety evaluation has been entirely skipped and even suppressed. The data, when available, should not be just reviewed by some "experts". either. My trust in government agencies was a zero for a while, post 2001. Now it's below zero, post 2019. They are an outright hazard, a threat to life because they deliberately lie and misinform. What they say has to be carefully evaluated like if someone had just given you an unknown chemical that could be highly dangerous. Some of what is published these days is OK, some standards are much higher... The lead studies cited earlier, tobacco etc, some real progress there. But standards fallen off the cliff elsewhere. "imho" of course. -g-

To: sense who wrote (187191)	4/30/2022 6:09:03 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217752

Climate change. From an atmosphere of methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, with high speed large amplitude tides due to our moon's few days orbit of Earth at much closer distance, climate changed on Earth right up to today. Just in the last couple of hundred million years since carboniferous times, the climate has changed dramatically, with sea level changes of hundreds of metres with a reduction of CO2 from thousands of parts per million right down to the tragedy of the commons [for chlorophyll dependants] 280 ppm before people started a vast carbon recycling process from buried carbon. Plants have loved the improvement to 420 ppm. More please!! 1000 ppm would be great for them. And probably us. Long before there was wifi and radar making aphids hop around, there was climate change writ large. Our little increase from 300 ppm to 400 ppm is not a biggie in the grand scheme of things and had negligible effect on climate. The addition of microwave transmissions is laughably trivial. Taupo eruptions have nothing to do with wifi. Or all the electromagnetic radiation combined. CO2 production is a big deal, but my estimate is that it's a very good thing, at least up to 500ppm, maybe 1000ppm. Just stopping the ice age if it has that much effect would be great. We sure won't want a return to glaciation, which was the main climate issue that is/was looming. Before CO2 gets to 500ppm people will be switching to cheaper, better, methods of getting energy. Nobody wants to buy oil. It's not like wine, cheese, and things wanted for their goodness. Free energy would be perfect for people who buy oil [unless it's to produce CO2 in glasshouses, fertilizer, plastics, pharmaceuticals and whatnot]. As Sheik Yamani said, the stone age didn't end for a lack of stones. Electricity for cars is much better, if cheaper, than oil. Hardly any moving parts. Even if oil, coal, gas is used for generating electricity in power stations, it's so much more efficient than burning it in cars [about 60% efficiency compared with 40% tops] that electric cars have an advantage [if the cost of the car is lowered to that of petrol/diesel cars]. But who cares about oil and climate when the end of the world is nigh? Mqurice