Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Babusek who wrote (7210)	2/9/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: WallStBum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

Absolutely. The earnings will speak for themselves. I just looked at the Baseline report for BNGO, and objectively BNGO is unbelievably priced for what you get. Price-to-book, price-to-revenues-, price-to-earnings, they're ALL rock bottom. And now investor sentiment is sh--ty already, so the downside risk is minimal. IMO this is a $12-$15 stock based on earings and ~30 PE (S&P 500 is about 22). A year from now the fog will have long burned off and what we'll see is a terrific company with tons of cash and expanding operations and cash flow. dax

To: Richard Babusek who wrote (7210)	2/10/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Richard Babusek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10368

Off topic, y2k compliance of institutions. Forgive the off topic subject, but this thread gives more reasoned responses than I tend to get elsewhere. Have any of you obtained a formal statement from your broker (or other financial institution) regarding y2k compliance, and what impact they expect from transactions with non-compliant institutions, or agencies? Banks, clearing houses, brokers, ... wow, the only institution i can think of with predictable results is my mattress <g>. Ricardo