SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1357245)5/3/2022 9:59:53 AM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1572208
 
It's what the VAST majority of Americans WANT U pinhead... not some illegitimate RADICAL judges that were "appointed" by presidents that did NOT WIN the popular vote...



To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1357245)5/3/2022 12:39:09 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1572208
 
None. Women who want abortions will still get them by crossing a state line. Liberal causes, corporate or other, will pay them to do so. Furthermore, the Dems will now be motivated to pass a federal law making abortion legal in all states. I just hope the Dems don't go too far and mandate unlimited abortion till birth.

A majority of Americans support abortion in the first trimester, but a majority do NOT support abortion past that point. The stats guy on MSNBC just pointed that out. When you get out to the third trimester support for abortion is only 19% while 80% oppose it.

My thoughts on abortionin the following two articles:

1:
Abortion will be considered unthinkable 50 years from now The moral case against abortion.

By Karen Swallow Prior Updated Apr 3, 2019, 9:24am EDT

: We asked 15 experts, “What do we do now that will be considered unthinkable in 50 years?” Here’s what they told us.

Karen Swallow Prior is Professor of English at Liberty University and a research fellow with the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention. She is the author of On Reading Well: Finding the Good Life through Great Books.

The list of those who have had few or no legal rights throughout history is staggering: women, children, orphans, widows, Jews, gays and lesbians, slaves, former slaves, descendants of slaves, those with leprosy, undocumented immigrants — to name a few.

Nothing marks the progress of any society more than the expansion of human rights to those who formerly lacked them. I believe that if such progress is to continue, prenatal human beings will be included in this group, and we will consider elective abortion primitive and cruel in the future.

The eradication of abortion may be difficult to imagine. But consider how difficult it would have been for our grandparents to foresee a culture in which nearly one in four women has an abortion by age 45. Certainly, some factors leading to this situation reflect real and substantial progress for women: greater equality, more work options, improved understanding of sexuality, and increased moral agency. But rights for women that come at the expense of unborn children aren’t true liberation; they merely, as one writer put it, enable the “ redistribution of oppression.”

Before the first trimester is over (when the vast majority of abortions are performed), a tiny fetus the size of a fig kicks her feet, yawns, sucks her thumb, and demonstrates her left- or right-handedness. Her heartbeat and brain waves are detectable just a few weeks after conception. Clearly, such beings are human — and all human rights begin with the right to life. The fact that many abortion rights supporters wish abortion to be “ rare” is an implicit acknowledgment of these undeniable, if inconvenient, truths.

So what will it take to disentangle the sexual, familial, economic, and political threads of legal elective abortion that have become so tightly woven into our cultural fabric? I think we are beginning to see that unraveling now.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last year that abortion hit its lowest rate since Roe v. Wade: 11.8 per 1,000 women ages 15-44, a dramatic decline from a peak in the early 1980s that approached 30 per 1,000 women. It’s unclear whether this decrease is owing to increased use of contraceptives; delayed sexual activity among young people; the declining number of doctors willing to participate in abortions; a growing inability to deny — thanks to ultrasound technology, prenatal surgical interventions, and extravagant gender reveal parties — the insuppressible personality of the child in the womb; or a combination of all these factors.

Whatever the cause, however, abortion is becoming less necessary and less desirable. Recent attempts in several states to expand access to late-term abortions in anticipation of the possible overturning of Roe not only violate the view of the majority (who support greater restrictions after the first trimester) but will be seen by future generations as a last, desperate show of stubbornness in the face of human progress.

Every age has its blinders, constructed, usually, through a combination of ignorance and self-interest. Many things such as bloodletting and wet nurses that are seen as good or indispensable in one age are unthinkable in another.

Our modern-day willingness to settle for sex apart from commitment, to accept the dereliction of duty by men who impregnate women (for men are the primary beneficiaries of liberal abortion laws), and to uphold the systematic suppression of sex’s creative energy and function are practices that people of other ages would have considered bizarre. As we enter late modernity and recognize the limits of the radical autonomy and individualism which have defined it, the pendulum will correct itself with a swing toward more communitarian and humane values that recognize the interdependency of all humans.

When we do, we will look back at elective abortion and wonder — as we do now with polluting and smoking — why we so wholeheartedly embraced it. We will look at those ultrasound images of 11-week old fetuses somersaulting in the waters of the womb and lack words to explain to our grandchildren why we ever defended their willful destruction in the name of personal choice and why we harmed so many women to do so.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18194710/abortion-will-be-considered-unthinkable-50-years-from-now


2:
Man With Down Syndrome Who Spoke About Sanctity of Life Says He Wants to Make Abortion ‘Unthinkable’

Nick Givas / @NGivasDC / February 01, 2019

[ Most people like Frank Stephens die while still in the womb. Why is thought to be a good thing? ]



"I want to change people’s hearts by changing people’s minds and hearts together,” former Special Olympian Frank Stephens says. (Photo: Screenshot from "Fox & Friends")

Former Special Olympian Frank Stephens spoke out about abortion on “Fox & Friends” Friday, after his video on the sanctity of life went viral on actor Ashton Kutcher’s Facebook page.

“I’d like to thank my friend Ashton Kutcher for bringing back my testimony,” he said. “It’s like the walking dead because it just won’t stay down.”

Stephens said he doesn’t want to make abortion illegal, but instead wants to make it “unthinkable.”

“About abortion, I don’t want to make it illegal,” he said. “I want to make it unthinkable. Politicians change laws. I want to change people’s hearts. I want to change people’s hearts by changing people’s minds and hearts together.”

Co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked Stephens why his life is worth living and he said he’s gotten to travel all across the world and enjoys the strong love of his family and friends.

“My life is worth living because it is fantastic,” he replied. “I’ve gotten to travel all over the world. I get to workshop a play in New York. I’m going to be in two documentaries, which will be on next month. And I have a lovely girlfriend, friends, and a wonderful family.”

dailysignal.com



To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1357245)5/3/2022 12:40:53 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
rdkflorida2
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572208
 
BTW Average Joe, I'm sick of a militant atheist like you pretending to be a Christian. You were kicked off of SI for harassing the family of a Canadian Jewish Christian. And its a shame they let you back.

You're not fooling anyone.