Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (24610)	5/3/2022 11:07:05 AM
From: h_	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz teevee Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37825

That question is a non sequitur, but the answer is no. You're only digging yourself deeper by quoting wikipedia, but that reveals even more than "scientific consensus" regarding your naivete. If you need to search for consensus, then your science has not reached a supportable conclusion. It is then no longer science, but opinion. Science has no room for opinions. Maybe in the deranged extreme leftist world, they'd like to believe it does so that they can twist their interpretations of science for their agenda, but in reality, science doesn't deal in opinion.