Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1357609)	5/5/2022 4:46:40 PM
From: Winfastorlose	2 Recommendations Recommended By IC720 Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573682

Over 40 million people are drawing water from those reservoirs on the Colorado. In the past, far fewer relied on the river for their water supply. That is the problem. Are you really so dense that you do not understand that? That article was written by a moron.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1357609)	5/5/2022 5:32:30 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573682

“But it’s not enough to fix the problem,” he said. “Throughout the Colorado River basin we are using more water than the river provides.” “We’ve expended a lot of effort in producing plans” for what happens when the reservoirs fall to critical levels, Mr. Udall said. “And what we’re finding out, unfortunately, is that these plans are turning out to be completely inadequate. All of a sudden, these new issues arise and haven’t having previously been considered and are really important.” Nothing like trusting scientists.... "Gee, we only looked at half the problem."