Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tntpal who wrote (37864)	5/8/2022 11:31:09 AM
From: tntpal	7 Recommendations Recommended By GUNSNGOLD isopatch Mick Mørmøny relewis roguedolphin and 2 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50198

Democrats deployed at least 2,000 mules "to rig the election for Biden" .@DineshDSouza: It is "now a proven fact" that Democrats deployed AT LEAST 2,000 mules "to rig the election for Biden" pic.twitter.com/iZlTiq0ifx — RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) May 6, 2022 Message 33834706

To: tntpal who wrote (37864)	5/10/2022 8:27:36 AM
From: tntpal	7 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs Hugh Bett isopatch Mick Mørmøny roguedolphin and 2 more members Respond to of 50198

Fauci's Royalties And The $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream Last year, the National Institutes of Health – Anthony Fauci’s employer – doled out $30 billion in government grants to roughly 56,000 recipients. That largess of taxpayer money buys a lot of favor and clout within the scientific, research, and healthcare industries. However, in our breaking investigation, we found hundreds of millions of dollars in payments also flow the other way. These are royalty payments from third-party payers (think pharmaceutical companies) back to the NIH and individual NIH scientists. We estimate that between fiscal years 2010 and 2020, more than $350 million in royalties were paid by third-parties to the agency and NIH scientists – who are credited as co-inventors. Because those payments enrich the agency and its scientists, each and every royalty payment could be a potential conflict of interest and needs disclosure... Consider how NIH is using taxpayer money to try and keep taxpayers ignorant and in the dark: 1. NIH defied the federal Freedom of Information Act law and refused to even acknowledge our open records request for the royalty payments. We filed our FOIA last September. 2. NIH used expensive taxpayer-funded litigation to slow-walk royalty disclosures (releasing the oldest royalties first). Although the agency admits to holding 3,000 pages, it will take ten months to produce them (300 pages per month). With Judicial Watch as our lawyers, we sued NIH in federal court last October. 3. NIH is heavily redacting key information on the royalty payments. For example, the agency erased 1. the payment amount, and, 2. who paid it! This makes the court-mandated production virtually worthless, despite our use of the latest forensic auditing tools NIH is essentially telling you, the taxpayer, to pay up and shut up. They'll run things. They have forgotten that they work on behalf of the American people. openthebooks.com Message 33836930

To: tntpal who wrote (37864)	5/11/2022 7:17:06 AM
From: tntpal	8 Recommendations Recommended By bhjslj Hugh Bett isopatch Maurice Winn Mick Mørmøny and 3 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50198