Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (24698)	5/7/2022 7:51:02 PM
From: h_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37138

Message 33833165 Note there is a typo: "14% of population jabbed to some degree" should read: "14% of population not jabbed to any degree." The jabbed are twice as likely to die as shown by BC government statistics from the BC CDC website. You're proven wrong again. pbs.twimg.com

To: Graystone who wrote (24698)	5/8/2022 1:12:48 PM
From: h_	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37138

I had no idea what you were incoherently rambling about when you wrote about Montana and "pink slime" and other garbage, but now I realize you're an incredibly easily triggered liberal that can't tolerate a conservative viewpoint and you likely believe that anything to the right of Lenin or Chairman Mao should be censored. So you found a liberal website that repurposed the term "pink slime" term which is actually what they serve you when you go to a fast food burger joint. Your brain has possibly rotted from consumption of said slime. The link I provided was merely the first one that came up which had the original tweets from Renz with the relevant numbers posted which one of your team claimed again and again were not given, but there they are. Regardless of your little tantrum, that was just a link that referred to the Renz lawsuit. Here's a site that asks more questions than can be answered without several FOIA filings to get to the bottom of it, but it certainly appears that something untoward is going on with the military vaccine injury database where numerous categories of data have very oddly been "adjusted" in a systematic way to achieve a particular outcome involving changes of several orders of magnitude without so much as a footnote explaining the changes: roundingtheearth.substack.com The result is a perfect obfuscation of the sudden increases in a broadly diverse range of illnesses that followed the mandatory jabbings. Of course, you're unable to discuss the substance of the issues, so again you'll reply with two stanzas, one standard type, one italic, filled with mindless rhetoric, appeal to authority, reiteration of false narratives, perhaps an irrelevant liberal website hypocritically screaming about "my body my choice" and ad hominem.