Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: h_ who wrote (24706)	5/8/2022 9:15:16 AM
From: Graystone	1 Recommendation Recommended By gg cox Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37174

Applying upgrades or Downgrading The government site has good data. Your problem is that you don't expect people to read your shiite do you? I read every post you made on this thread and there wasn't one good link, not one, all substack crap. You did post a link to some pink slime site pretending to be a Montana newspaper. But of course poor innocent you, what was your claim, you were ignored for posting FDA and CDC links. That is what you claimed here wasn't it, that we ignored your CDC and FDA links? So you were lying to everyone when you said we ignored your good links, you didn't post any did you? What is it with people who want to lie and misinform, what have you got against telling the truth. You could just say I have a bunch of really stupid links that support my really stupid conclusions. Lying about what you post is just one form of misinformation you know. So now that you have posted a real link, you want to misinterpret that data, cherry pick a few samples. The downgraded version of thought that you employ doesn't work that well. No one is here to educate people who have downgraded their mind. No one can help you overcome the challenges of having downgraded your mind. If you cannot keep up with simple facts then you might consider new software. Whatever you do no one should have to hold your pee pee when you go. I gave you a clue but you don't seem to understand simple English. The age adjusted mortality for the unvaccinated vs the triple vaccinated is stark. It is relevant, available and the datapoint says in simple English, get vaccinated, get boosted. I posted the link to the data earlier, perhaps you missed it. The BC data says the same thing, get vaccinated, get boosted. But you think that is all a lie don't you? Is there anyone who isn't on substack that is telling the truth?