SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (235881)5/11/2022 10:02:05 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 356338
 
Allowing a private citizen to sue someone isn’t a state travel ban.

If you're being literal about it, sure. I have see no one remotely propose stopping women from leaving the state for an abortion or any other purpose. That would not be practicable.

But it would be effectively a travel ban if you either prosecuted the women when they returned home or could punish an out of state provider such that they would no longer offer their services.

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Louisiana House committee voted Wednesday to make abortion a crime of homicide for which a woman ending her pregnancy could be charged, along with anyone helping her.

Missouri earlier this year became the first state to consider penalties for abortions sought by Missouri residents in other states. The law, which has not been enacted, would allow people to sue out-of-state physicians and anybody who helps get the patient across state lines. Advocates in Texas have reportedly looked at similar legislation.

And experts say that laws criminalizing abortion, and bills like the one Louisiana has advanced, could draw prosecutors to charge people for crossing state lines for abortions.

Some large employers say they will cover the costs of travel for out-of-state abortions. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is proposing legislation to prevent them from writing off such costs. Rubio says his bill, called the No Tax Breaks for Radical Corporate Activism Act (which would also apply to gender-affirming care for children), is needed to prevent the government from subsidizing abortion. washingtonpost.com