SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aladin who wrote (762779)5/12/2022 12:15:29 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
THE WATSONYOUTH

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
The Soviet Union seeded many of its territories with Russians and promoted Russian speakers.
While often ethnically cleansing the area of the people who had lived there
Absolutely not, but no one in the international community, Europe, Nato or the US made any attempt to stop the bloodshed in the Donbas.
It was a war in Donbas, not a one sided slaughter. A war largly instigated by Russia and which included active Russian army participation.

No one took active military measures to stop it because doing so would mean war with Ukraine or Russia or both depending on exactly what you did. As for steps short of war Russia was sanctioned (although that was more about Crimea), and no one other than maybe Russia wanted to sanction Ukraine for trying to keep control of its own territory.



To: aladin who wrote (762779)5/12/2022 12:28:11 PM
From: greenspirit3 Recommendations

Recommended By
aladin
steve harris
TimF

  Respond to of 793914
 
I may have missed it, but I never saw anyone opining here that NATO should get involved to stop the bloodshed in Donbas.

I would go even further and suggest anyone thinking along those lines would be criticized for creating a WW3 potential scenario by inflaming tensions.