Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (187524)	5/13/2022 6:01:14 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219937

Re <<The gold is there, but it’s no longer physical, it’s in digital form in the bank’s accounts with Affinor.>> Am sure the gold is ‘there’ there the minute people stops asking about ‘it’ and where ‘there’ might be. The gold is ALWAYS ‘there’, and shall likely remain ‘there’, where the people ‘here’ shall never access, because there is a line between ‘here’ and ‘there’ :0)))))

To: ggersh who wrote (187524)	5/14/2022 5:23:38 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219937

"The gold is deposited in a structure where"... Note how the article is full of names tied to the "suspicious" Belgian company, the Turkish refiner... the intermediary used in effecting the transfers... and the Bank and public officials in Guinea... and it even addresses a London court case... But, not once do they bother to mention... where the gold actually went ? "deposited in a structure"... where ? The article poses as an expose of nefarious dealings... but refuses to name those behind the "deal" that actually separates Guinea from its gold ? "He who shall not be named"... always who is really behind it ?