Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: viper who wrote (5009)	2/9/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: c.r. earle	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10836

Viper, and charred I will be civil to you both, even though I find it challenging, and in all honesty find myself somewhat embarrassed in responding to these inane posts that you both have committed to public view. Viper, earlier you mentioned Bre-x in hoping to draw a parallel with the fate that awaits KRY. Do you remember the way in which Bre-x traded the last several weeks before the implosion. It gradually started a retreat from around the $18 mark to approx. an intra-day low of $14 and then rallied back to approx. $16 and then that all too painful halt. The rest,...well you know what they say! You maybe inquiring at this point what is the one I am trying to make. Well very simply this, the market was already advising us as to where Bre-x was eventually going to rest. Many of us did not heed this warning. This market is presently advising us (you) of where KRY is going, and has been for the last week. As you continue to embarrass all of us (as does charred)with your less than honest representations the market continues to trend in the other direction. Why? So I fail to understand your logic. But then I am reminded of your intentions and unfortunately they are not honourable. The comments regarding Ruiz, as you and charred incessantly chatter is 'very negative', well why did the stock continue to rise today, regardless of its high, it was up $.75. For the rest of you, it would be interesting to go through the GIT thread a few months back. Charred showed up there one day after sending me an e-mail questioning their findings but signing it in another persons name. He never did answer my questions. We should start a thread listing all shorters that claim to be anything but, ones that present themselves as these two individuals do here and alluding to problems in developments when in fact there real goal to win by deception. It is unfortunate that you choose to present yourselves in this manner, it speaks volumes of your character. I do not resent someone who is short and presents a reasonable perspective. You could both learn a great deal from Ward. One other comment I would like to make, I always find it curious when an exchange halts a stock which is going up aggressively, but rarely if ever halts a stock that is going done in the same manner. It just seems odd. Regards