SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (187754)5/18/2022 9:26:01 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217901
 
Another NATO state wants to block Sweden and Finland from joining
Following Turkey’s move, Croatia’s president also seeks a better deal with the bloc if Zagreb votes to invite the Nordic states

rt.com



To: TobagoJack who wrote (187754)5/19/2022 9:06:46 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217901
 
anything noteworthy from the front as far as you are reckoning?

Upcoming FDA Decision A Potentially Major De-Risk Event For Revive Therapeutics

By Benjamin A. Smith On May 18, 2022

It’s been a long and arduous road for Revive Therapeutics Ltd. (CNSX: RVV, OTCMKTS: RVVTF) regarding their Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Bucillamine to treat COVID-19. The trial—fraught by several milestone misses and enrollment delays—could potentially receive a material boost after Revive submitted a request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine and agree on reorganizing the current study’s primary efficacy endpoints to a “symptoms” focus versus the current benchmark measuring a reduction of death and hospitalizations. If successful, the trial would undergo a major de-risking event, as clinical outcomes observed over the course of the pandemic have shifted.

The announcement by Revive Therapeutics, disseminated on May 16, reaffirmed what many observers had expected following a changed primary endpoint of Adamis Pharmaceutical’s Tempol trial from a hospitalization to symptoms focus. The company confirmed that it “has submitted a request” to “determine and agree” on potential new primary efficacy endpoints with the FDA. Furthermore, Revive reaffirmed that following expectations of “obtain(ing) FDA agreement on the potential new primary efficacy endpoints in June 2022”, it will also meet with the study’s Data Safety and Monitoring Board shortly thereafter to determine next steps.

The unusual endpoint change precedent was recently established in the Adamis Pharmaceuticals Tempol trial, which began in September 2021. It was originally designed to enroll 248 patients overall to measure a reduction in hospitalizations versus placebo. Given overall lower hospitalization rates in the general population as the pandemic has progressed, the company requested and was granted endpoint change from hospitalizations to lower-threshold COVID symptom endpoints in April. The new benchmark allows Adamis to evaluate the difference in the rate of sustained clinical resolution of symptoms of COVID-19 at Day 14, as opposed to the rate of hospitalization in Tempol-treated vs. placebo patient population.

The FDA’s midtrial endpoint change allowance is a rare event and signals flexibility by the organization to allow parameter changes in accordance to the shifting symptomatic profile of the pandemic.

Furthermore, Pfizer’s Paxlovid trial was previously designed with a focus towards symptom improvement as a primary endpoint. Although Paxlovid failed to show symptom improvement initially, the study was unblinded and continued. Eventually, Pfizer demonstrated enough efficacy and safety that the FDA issued an emergency use authorization for Paxlovid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older.

At the present time, Paxlovid is considered the gold-standard frontline oral COVID therapeutic currently available in the marketplace, although there are already signs that real-world efficacy is waning. Pfizer has previously stated that it expects to generate upwards of $22 billion in Paxlovid sales this year alone.

Revive Therapeutics is hoping for similar consideration that Adamis received from the FDA regarding symptomatic endpoint change. With much more Phase 3 patient data (715) in its database, it appears to have solid grounds to request similar treatment. In Pfizer’s case, the FDA outright allowed symptoms reduction as a primary endpoint.

Either way, the precedent for COVID symptomatic endpoints reduction has long been set. Revive Therapeutics is strategically attempting to use a standard already established by the FDA. Concurrently, the strategy involves soliciting Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) support for Bucillamine to explore the potential of securing development and commercial scale-up funding.

We’ll find out soon enough whether the FDA amicable supporters of Revive’s endpoint pivot.

What This Could Mean For Revive Therapeutics

The upcoming FDA decision to potentially allow new primary efficacy endpoints is a game-changing event given that deaths and hospitalizations have been declining with subsequent COVID variants—such as Omicron and BA.2—becoming dominant. While there is evidence that Bucillamine has demonstrated outstanding efficacy on a standalone basis in the current trial, it will be difficult to prove statistical significance against the placebo arm if hospitalization rates remain low. Hence, we view the potential lowering of endpoint threshold to a symptoms benchmark as a material de-risking event for the company.

Source: Bucillamine Patent Document
Indeed, declining hospitalization rates have likely prompted Revive to become very selective on patient enrollment. Increased vigilance towards patient selectivity—along with enrollee competitiveness with other pharmaceutical companies conducting COVID trials—has impacted the speed of Revive’s COVID trial. So much so that Revive Therapeutics announced last December that it would fill part of its patient enrollment quota outside of the U.S. in a bid for patient diversification.

Ultimately, the shift to symptoms as a primary endpoint is all about probabilities. With the current endpoints of death and hospitalizations, Revive has a much higher bar to obtain statistical significance against the placebo arm in the trial. This is not an indictment of the efficacy of Bucillamine, but rather an acknowledgement of the reality that most folks do not require hospital visitation upon catching COVID.

The bottom line: FDA endpoint change approval will greatly improve Revive’s odds of favorable clinical trial outcome and possible Emergency Use Authorization approval downstream. Given increasing evidence that frontline oral COVID medications are failing—and plenty of extra-curricular evidence that thiol drugs are effective against SARS-CoV-2 to prevent injury—Revive appears to be sitting in a favorable position for endpoint change assuming the current trial data is sound.

Now, in the less than 30 days, the FDA is poised to deliver a decisive verdict. One that can change both the fortunes of the general population, and Revive investors a like.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (187754)5/19/2022 10:18:24 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217901
 
It is note worthy that the RVVTF repurposed Bucillamine drug trial for Covid19 is also approved for Liver transplant orphan drug trials.

And kids are dying of Liver disease caused by Covid19 according the news this week.




Does COVID-19 damage the liver?

Some patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have had increased levels of liver enzymes — such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Increased levels of liver enzymes can mean that a person’s liver is at least temporarily damaged. People with cirrhosis [liver scarring] may be at increased risk of COVID-19. Some studies have shown that people with pre-existing liver disease (chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, or related complications) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 are at higher risk of death than people without pre-existing liver disease.

===========

Multi-Country – Acute, severe hepatitis of unknown origin in children
23 April 2022 a month ago/

???????

Please note that this Disease Outbreak News has been revised to correct the WHO working case definition that was published on 23 April 2022.

Outbreak at a glance:

Since the WHO Disease Outbreak News on Acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology – the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was published on 15 April 2022, there have been continuing further reports of cases of acute hepatitis of unknown origin among young children. It is not yet clear if there has been an increase in hepatitis cases, or an increase in awareness of hepatitis cases that occur at the expected rate but go undetected. While adenovirus is a possible hypothesis, investigations are ongoing for the causative agent.

Outbreak overview

As of 21 April 2022, at least 169 cases of acute hepatitis of unknown origin have been reported from 11 countries in the WHO European Region and one country in the WHO Region of the Americas (Figure 1). Cases have been reported in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the United Kingdom) (114), Spain (13), Israel (12), the United States of America (9), Denmark (6), Ireland (<5), The Netherlands (4), Italy (4), Norway (2), France (2), Romania (1), and Belgium (1).

Figure 1. Distribution of cases of acute severe hepatitis of unknown origin by country, as of 23 April 2022.



Cases are aged 1 month to 16 years old. Seventeen children (approximately 10%) have required liver transplantation; at least one death has been reported.

The clinical syndrome among identified cases is acute hepatitis (liver inflammation) with markedly elevated liver enzymes. Many cases reported gastrointestinal symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhoea and vomiting preceding presentation with severe acute hepatitis, and increased levels of liver enzymes (aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) greater the 500 IU/L) and jaundice. Most cases did not have a fever. The common viruses that cause acute viral hepatitis (hepatitis viruses A, B, C, D and E) have not been detected in any of these cases. International travel or links to other countries based on the currently available information have not been identified as factors.

Adenovirus has been detected in at least 74 cases, and of the number of cases with information on molecular testing, 18 have been identified as F type 41. SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 20 cases of those that were tested. Furthermore, 19 were detected with a SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus co-infection.

The United Kingdom, where the majority of cases have been reported to date, has recently observed a significant increase in adenovirus infections in the community (particularly detected in faecal samples in children) following low levels of circulation earlier in the COVID-19 pandemic. The Netherlands also reported concurrent increasing community adenovirus circulation.

Nevertheless, due to enhanced laboratory testing for adenovirus, this could represent the identification of an existing rare outcome occurring at levels not previously detected that is now being recognized due to increased testing.

Public health response
Further investigations are ongoing in countries that have identified cases and include more detailed clinical and exposure histories, toxicology testing (i.e. environmental and food toxicity testing), and additional virological/microbiological tests. Affected countries have also initiated enhanced surveillance activities.

WHO and ECDC are supporting countries with the ongoing investigations and collecting information from the countries reporting cases. All available information is further disseminated by countries through their Hepatitis Networks and clinical organisations such as the European Association for the Study of the Liver, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).

For cases in Europe, joint WHO/ECDC data collection will be established using The European Surveillance System (TESSy).

Guidance derived by the United Kingdom Health Security Agency has been issued to affected countries to support a thorough investigation of suspected cases.

WHO risk assessment
The United Kingdom first reported an unexpected significant increase in cases of severe acute hepatitis of unknown origin in young, generally previously healthy children. An unexpected increase of such cases has now been reported by several other countries – notably Ireland and the Netherlands.

While adenovirus is currently one hypothesis as the underlying cause, it does not fully explain the severity of the clinical picture. Infection with adenovirus type 41, the implicated adenovirus type, has not previously been linked to such a clinical presentation. Adenoviruses are common pathogens that usually cause self-limited infections. They spread from person-to-person and most commonly cause respiratory illness, but depending on the type, can also cause other illnesses such as gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach or intestines), conjunctivitis (pink eye), and cystitis (bladder infection). There are more than 50 types of immunologically distinct adenoviruses that can cause infections in humans. Adenovirus type 41 typically presents as diarrhea, vomiting, and fever, often accompanied by respiratory symptoms. While there have been case reports of hepatitis in immunocompromised children with adenovirus infection, adenovirus type 41 is not known to be a cause of hepatitis in otherwise healthy children.

Factors such as increased susceptibility amongst young children following a lower level of circulation of adenovirus during the COVID-19 pandemic, the potential emergence of a novel adenovirus, as well as SARS-CoV-2 co-infection, need to be further investigated. Hypotheses related to side effects from the COVID-19 vaccines are currently not supported as the vast majority of affected children did not receive COVID-19 vaccination. Other infectious and non-infectious explanations need to be excluded to fully assess and manage the risk.

With continued new notifications of recent onset cases, at least in the United Kingdom, together with more extensive case searching, it is very likely that more cases will be detected before the cause can be confirmed and more specific control and prevention measures can be implemented.

WHO is closely monitoring the situation and working with the United Kingdom health authorities, other Member States and partners.

WHO advice
Further work is required to identify additional cases, both in currently affected countries and elsewhere. The priority is to determine the cause of these cases to further refine control and prevention actions. Common prevention measures for adenovirus and other common infections involve regular hand washing and respiratory hygiene.

Member States are strongly encouraged to identify, investigate and report potential cases fitting the case definition1. Epidemiological and risk factor information should be collected and submitted by Member States to WHO and partner agencies through agreed reporting mechanisms. Any epidemiological links between or among the cases might provide clues for tracking the source of illness. Temporal and geographical information about the cases, as well as their close contacts should be reviewed for potential risk factors.

WHO recommends that testing of blood (with initial anecdotal experience that whole blood is more sensitive than serum), serum, urine, stool, and respiratory samples, as well as liver biopsy samples (when available) should be undertaken, with further virus characterization including sequencing. Other infectious and non-infectious causes need to be thoroughly investigated.

WHO does not recommend any restriction on travel and/or trade with the United Kingdom, or any other country where cases are identified, based on the currently available information.

1WHO working case definition:

Confirmed: N/A at presentProbable: A person presenting with an acute hepatitis (non hepA-E*) with serum transaminase >500 IU/L (AST or ALT), who is 16 years and younger, since 1 October 2021Epi-linked: A person presenting with an acute hepatitis (non hepA-E*) of any age who is a close contact of a probable case, since 1 October 2021.*If hepatitis A-E serology results are awaited, but other criteria met, these can be reported and will be classified as “pending classification”. Cases with other explanations for their clinical presentation are discarded.



Further information
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Increase in hepatitis (liver inflammation) cases in children under investigation UKHSA Guidance note including recommended tests European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Update: Hepatitis of unknown origin in children WHO Disease Outbreak News; Acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology - the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. US Centres for Disease Control Health Advisory, Recommendations for Adenovirus Testing and Reporting of Children with Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology CDC Alerts Providers to Hepatitis Cases of Unknown OriginCitable reference: World Health Organization (23 April 2022). Disease Outbreak News; Multi-Country – Acute, severe hepatitis of unknown origin in children. Available at: who.int