Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (188247)	5/31/2022 6:03:53 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217766

Re <<Russia seems to me to have done okay>> 5:54am. Just reviewed Team India produced but propaganda only when anything about China, and tries to be neutral w/r to Ukraine / Russia. The pictures, if current, and believe more current than not, gives context to follow on videos featuring maps and talking heads Pro-Ukraine Pro-Russia but seems to stick to the facts as perceived or wish to be perceived Pro-Russia, but limited in editorial, connecting the dots of first hand reports of both sides to arrive at a narrative that links up with the above military summary reports By the above reports, I get the distinct feeling that Russia is keeping up intense (at over 1500 shells per day) shelling against specific 'caldronised' Ukrainian defenders having been either charged by political-leadership or manoeuvred by suboptimal manoeuvre warfare into 'caldrons' to be barraged, and under the circumstances, the Team USA shipments of announced weaponry, in kind language, is paltry, in line w/ continuing rug pull. Team USA best up the tempo, calibre, and range of weapons, else I find dubious the narrative that the Ukrainian War is important to Nato in existential sense. Ukraine might just be a stepped up version of Afghanistan, ala just-another-proxy. NATO did wrong per mandate or per self-claim, in both Afghanistan and Ukraine, full stop. But I get that the Russians are to blame, because did wrong. And both sides continue to do wrong. In the meantime I get that China China China is the global danger #1, per MSM and NATO leadership, because the Atlantic is so very close to the Pacific, given that there a a new geographic feature heretofore undiscovered, called Indo-Pacific. I now review ... The image that keeps floating around in my head is below. How did your neighbours in Australia rid themselves of Scott Morrison? And does it even matter to forward policy? Australia and New Zealand must step up, given Indo-Pacific is business of N Atlantic TO, reasoning must go that N Atlantic is the task for AUKUS, and therefore same ranking for Central Asia-esque / Far Eastern-esque Europe that is Ukraine