Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1362090)	6/11/2022 8:44:04 AM
From: golfer72	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583323

Case closed LOL! Obsessed!

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1362090)	6/11/2022 9:55:23 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Respond to of 1583323

WOW...she's neck and neck with bumbling Biden for polling and popularity Liz Polling At Just 28%

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1362090)	6/11/2022 10:00:13 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583323

AZ’s Biggs Blows Off ‘Illegitimate’ Committee’s Subpoena GOP Rep Draws a Line in the Sand, Refuses Order from 'Illegitimate' Jan. 6 Committee he said it centers on how House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formed the “rigged” panel investigating last year’s Capitol incursion without allowing Republicans to choose a single member to serve on it. “In an unprecedented step, she denied House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-Calif.) selections for the committee. She appointed the anti-Trump, anti-Republican duo of Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), ensuring only members who supported her desired political outcome would serve on the committee,” Biggs wrote for American Greatness on Wednesday. “The committee has been issuing subpoenas to the public and now, members of Congress, without authority,” the lawmaker continued. “The committee is required to submit subpoena requests to the ranking member of the committee before subpoenas can be issued. But there is no true ranking member. Pelosi removed the ranking member McCarthy selected to represent the Republican conference,” Biggs said. he said it centers on how House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formed the “rigged” panel investigating last year’s Capitol incursion without allowing Republicans to choose a single member to serve on it. “In an unprecedented step, she denied House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-Calif.) selections for the committee. She appointed the anti-Trump, anti-Republican duo of Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), ensuring only members who supported her desired political outcome would serve on the committee,” Biggs wrote for American Greatness on Wednesday. “The committee has been issuing subpoenas to the public and now, members of Congress, without authority,” the lawmaker continued. “The committee is required to submit subpoena requests to the ranking member of the committee before subpoenas can be issued. But there is no true ranking member. Pelosi removed the ranking member McCarthy selected to represent the Republican conference,” Biggs said. NB: (the new definition of HYPOCRITES is below) “The committee, which is populated by members of Congress who objected to certification of electors when Trump won in 2016, believe that anyone who objected to 2020 electors somehow attempted to overthrow the government,” he wrote. Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, who serves on the Jan. 6 committee, objected to the certification of Florida’s electors in 2016.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1362090)	6/11/2022 10:02:08 AM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Recommended By tntpal Winfastorlose Respond to of 1583323

Worth repeating: NB: (the new definition of HYPOCRITES is below) “The committee, which is populated by members of Congress who objected to certification of electors when Trump won in 2016, believe that anyone who objected to 2020 electors somehow attempted to overthrow the government,” he wrote. Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, who serves on the Jan. 6 committee, objected to the certification of Florida’s electors in 2016. GOP Rep Draws a Line in the Sand, Refuses Order from 'Illegitimate' Jan. 6 Committee (westernjournal.com)

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1362090)	6/11/2022 10:21:32 AM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock Winfastorlose Respond to of 1583323

Trainwreck... FACTS MATTER FLASH for ignorant grubers that lie and spam. More people watched reruns. DUH! DUH!! “Context: The evening newscasts on CBS, NBC & ABC average anywhere from 18 to 20 million viewers combined on a typical night,” Trainwreck: Ratings Are in for Jan. 6 Committee Production Original Article The numbers are in for the Jan. 6 Committee production. If we looked at how people were tuning out, it stood to reason it wasn’t going to go well. As anticipated, it didn’t. So to translate that into something that helps you understand how much it bombed, here’s The Hill’s media guy, Joe Concha noting that this is significantly smaller than the regular newscasts that they run that don’t have the advantage of running in primetime. “Context: The evening newscasts on CBS, NBC & ABC average anywhere from 18 to 20 million viewers combined on a typical night,” Concha explained. “Those newscasts do not air in primetime. <snip> According to Newsbusters, “evening newscast audiences on any given night last week were 1.6 times larger than the total number of broadcast viewers who tuned into the hearings on Thursday.” Of course, one of the issues is that it wasn’t “new”; most people have seen most of it and it’s from a year-and-a-half ago. Not to mention that many don’t view it as a legitimate committee, but as a political show trial. For more contrast, Joe Biden’s “State of the Union” address in March had 38 million viewers. In 2018, President Donald Trump’s first “State of the Union” attracted 45.6 million, in 2019 it was even higher at 46.8 million. It didn’t go well on CBS, as the Free Beacon explained. Just 3.24 million people watched the network’s “Capitol Assault Hearings” coverage Thursday night, according to the TV Ratings Guide. Exactly one week prior, 3.86 million people tuned in to CBS to watch a Young Sheldon rerun, meaning an old episode of the coming-of-age sitcom garnered roughly 600,000 more viewers than the inaugural hearing. That gap is even more pronounced for new Young Sheldon episodes. More than seven million people, for example, watched the show’s season five finale, titled “A Clogged Pore, a Little Spanish, and the Future,” during CBS’s 8 p.m. slot on Thursday, May 19. Three weeks earlier, 6.9 million people watched a new episode titled, “Uncle Sheldon and a Hormonal Firecracker.”