Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2603)	2/10/1998 6:57:00 AM
From: dealmakr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18691

Bill, I have to disagree with you on this one. Yes there is a lot of cheerleading going on over in the thread. Go to the research site to get more info on this particular issue for the factory floor. I have done a lot of DD on this issue and y2k is just a part of the companies plans for the future. Earnings are due this week also a conference call I believe on Fri. Earnings are not expected to be that great for 2q, but 3q should tell the tale. Zweig& Drefus also hold positions here. Stock is now giong to be very volitile after breaking out on huge volume to new highs. Will be a great trading stock up or down after momentum. Intel has bought one of their cd roms. Don't know what they intend, but could be interesting. JMHO this one has a better chance of doubling from here than going back to 3-4 dollar range. This ain't no Zitel scam. Risk-reward ratio IMO is very small at the current price. Good Trading Dave PS: After the Texas conf. do you see weakness resuming in ZONA?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2603)	2/10/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 18691

<< . What really piqued my interest was when I found out that Emerald Research - who were also partially responsible for the Zitel stock fraud - is actively promoting TPRO >> These were the same guys promoting IOM all the way down to the single digits.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2603)	2/10/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Susan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18691

ROFLMAO...all the way to the bank. You know nothing about the TAVA/TOPRO situation. Check your FACTS before you post such nonsense.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2603)	2/10/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Starduster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18691

Bill, You are one mixed up dude. You couldn't have possibly done any DD on TPRO or for that matter know anything about Y2K. You people better be careful whom you listen to, Kramer doesn't lie. Lucky

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2603)	2/10/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: count gold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18691

bw: More likely schmear here than schlock...with you being der schmearmeister. Now that u have clearly delineated your position that the Intel connection with TPRO is false we wouldnt expect that you would need to say anything more until your charge is proven true. Until that time your credibility on this thread hovers right around zip. Count g