SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (1362866)6/16/2022 1:22:50 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683
 
suicidal dimwits like you ARE the problem. Germany won't ship a part to Russia, would rather freeze to death.

"This was followed by news Tuesday that state-controlled Russian energy giant Gazprom said flows to Europe were restricted after Canadian sanctions over the war in Ukraine prevented German partner Siemens Energy from delivering a gas turbine that powers a compressor station on the pipeline that was recently overhauled."

To: denizen48 who wrote (5998)6/16/2022 1:12:13 PM
From: Broken_Clock of 6013
I like how Biden blames Putin for the sanctions that Biden enacted. How long before Biden alienates the entire Eurozone?

Let's see in January when Germans are cutting down fences, furniture and forests for fuel like a scene from Dr. Zhivago...

====

European NatGas Soars 70% In Week Amid Freeport Delays And Russian Cuts

by Tyler Durden

Thursday, Jun 16, 2022 - 04:26 AM

A combination of factors this week and last have put a massive squeeze on crucial natural gas flows to Europe, sending prices sky-high.

Dutch front-month NatGas futures, the European benchmark, jumped as much as 24% Thursday morning, adding to the 46% increase this week and last. Flow reductions began last Wednesday when an explosion rocked the Freeport LNG Terminal in Quintana, Texas. Most LNG exports from that facility end up in Europe as the continent weens off Russian supplies.

[url=][/url]

Rapid shifts in the supply dynamic have sent US NatGas prices tumbling (though rising Thursday morning) while EU NatGas soars.

[url=][/url]

This was followed by news Tuesday that state-controlled Russian energy giant Gazprom said flows to Europe were restricted after Canadian sanctions over the war in Ukraine prevented German partner Siemens Energy from delivering a gas turbine that powers a compressor station on the pipeline that was recently overhauled.

Then on Wednesday, Russian NatGas deliveries through Nord Stream to Europe dropped and are expected to decline by around 40% this year.

Prospects of Europe running out of Russian NatGas are increasing as flow reductions have been reported by companies including Eni SpA, Engie SA, and Uniper SE. Germany calls the reductions through Nord Stream "politically motivated" by Moscow.

Utility Uniper said Wednesday it had received 25% less than contracted from Russia, while Austria's OMV AG and France's Engie also got lower volumes. Italy's Eni said Gazprom was providing only 65% of the requested amount on Thursday. -Bloomberg

What's exacerbated the energy crisis in Europe is the attempt to ween itself off Russian fossil fuels and monetary tightening by the central bank, sparking what could be signs of stagflation.

The Kremlin released a statement Thursday, indicating the recent cuts through Nord Stream were "not deliberate."

[url=][/url]

Hungary has been the latest country to break ranks with the EU to accept Moscow's demand to pay in rubles for NatGas. However, Poland, Bulgaria, and Finland have rejected such a scheme which forced Moscow to halt shipments to those countries.

Russia tightened its grip on European energy markets. It forced the German energy regulator to advise customers this week to reduce consumption so that storage sites could be refilled before summer officially starts.

Between Russian supply cuts and Western sanctions on Russia preventing key equipment from being installed on Nord Stream, total cuts through the pipeline have been about 60% to 65 million cubic meters a day. Factor in the prospect of LNG import disruptions from US' Freeport, and the supply outlook in the EU becomes more bearish as gas demand for cooling soars with summer just days away, which means delays in filling inventories could be lead to a harsh European winter.

"Gas prices will continue in the winter to be very high," Marco Alvera, former chief executive officer of Italian network operator Snam SpA said at a conference on Thursday.

"Winter gas prices will be high, winter power prices will be high."

BCS Global Markets NatGas senior analyst Ron Smith said further disruptions to LNG flows to Europe, such as another Freeport incident, could send EU NatGas prices up "another 50%."



To: Land Shark who wrote (1362866)6/16/2022 1:29:49 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683
 
When someone like you embraces and believes a massive lie, then reality is a shocker.
+++

Anti-Oil Lobby Faces Reality Check As Global Demand Is Set To Break Records By Irina Slav - Jun 15, 2022, 7:00 PM CDT
  • UN Secretary General: investing in fossil fuels is delusional.
  • Anti-oil narrative clashes with reality of increasing demand.
  • IEA has changed its narrative and is now calling for more production


Join Our Community

Last year, the International Energy Agency made headlines by calling for an end to new oil and gas exploration by the end of the year. A few months later, the IEA was calling for more oil.

This week, the secretary-general of the United Nations, Antonio Guterres, said that investing in new oil and gas production was “delusional”, calling on “all financial actors to abandon fossil fuel finance” and focus on renewables instead.

But the UN’s most senior official did not stop there. Guterres then went on to say that “The only true path to energy security, stable power prices, prosperity and a livable planet lies in abandoning polluting fossil fuels — especially coal — and accelerating the renewables-based energy transition.”

This is a sentiment shared by the head of the IEA, too, on numerous occasions. Like Guterres, the IEA’s Fatih Birol is a staunch supporter of the energy transition, which he sees as the only way forward. Unlike Guterres, Birol seems willing to allow for the fact that we still need oil, and lots of it.

Last month, Birol warned of even higher oil prices during the summer because of strong demand, expressing hope that several large oil producers would increase their output this year.

“I very much hope that the increase coming from [the] United States, from Brazil, Canada this year, [will] be accompanied by the increase coming from the key producers in Middle East and elsewhere,” Birol told CNBC in an interview on the sidelines of the Davos gathering.

“Otherwise, we have only one hope that we don’t have big trouble in the oil markets in summer, which is hoping … that the Chinese demand remains very weak.”

In other words, the IEA’s head, unlike the head of the UN, acknowledged the fact that the world is consuming ever-growing volumes of oil, and the fact that these volumes cannot come from wind parks and solar farms in what could be seen as a big win for realism.

Guterres, meanwhile, is not only calling for the end of oil but is also telling university graduates to avoid getting a job in the oil and gas industry, calling these companies “climate wreckers” and warning that “accountability is coming for those who liquidate our future.”

Meanwhile, a barrel of Brent crude is trading above $121, West Texas Intermediate is trading for over $119 per barrel, and OPEC just reported that its output last month had declined. Libya is on its last oil legs, producing about a tenth of what it was producing at the start of the year.

U.S. shale companies have flatly refused to upend their plans following calls from President Biden—another energy transition devotee—to pump more, Saudi Arabia appears reluctant to tap its spare oil capacity, and Russia is redirecting oil flows under sanctions, although few believe it would be able to place all barrels that currently go to Europe elsewhere, predicting a substantial loss of output.

The oil market imbalance, then, may be about to deepen further, making oil even more expensive, highlighting its vital importance for every economy in the world, including Mr. Guterres’ very own Portugal, a leader in renewable energy and a country dependent on oil imports because it ended its own oil and gas production as part of its transition.

Speaking of renewables, the UN’s secretary-general is not the only one eager to see a lot more money being poured into wind and solar. The European Commission’s leadership is likewise eager for this. It has even suggested cutting red tape for new wind and solar projects in order to speed up the buildup in renewable energy capacity.

Taking care of the demand side, the European Parliament recently voted in favor of a ban on internal combustion engine car sales, to enter into effect in 2035. This means that EVs must go from 0.5 percent of all cars in the European Union to 100 percent in eight years. Nobody is calling this delusional.

Talking about the costs of the transition to renewables is also something that is not being talked about much, although news about metals and minerals prices is making it to the public. Despite this news, neither Guterres, the Biden administration, nor the EU administration seems willing or able to make the connection with their renewable energy plans, which are about to become even more expensive than they were. Meanwhile, the price of oil keeps rising.

Denying a certain reality because it is too far from your preferred reality is perhaps a form of self-preservation. This form of self-preservation, however, cannot go on forever because sooner or later, actual reality asserts itself, often painfully.

Calling oil and gas investment “delusional” might sit well with climate activists in June but come winter, when these activists, just like everyone else, will have to pay for heating, things might look differently, especially in Europe, as less sunlight reaches the surface in the northern hemisphere and wind speeds decline as they tend to do during the winter.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com



To: Land Shark who wrote (1362866)6/16/2022 5:19:34 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573683
 
Sharkie,
The only solution to that is driving demand for oil down through renewable energy.
We've been saying that for how long now?

Weren't we saying this right after September 11, 2001?

Weren't we saying this after we found out Osama bin Laden and most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals?

Weren't we saying this as we invaded Iraq, kicked Saddam out, and supposedly tried to take Iraq's oil for ourselves?

Weren't we saying this as we bailed out GM and Chrysler back in 2010? I still remember, after getting caught flying in private jets, how the auto execs then drove to Washington in POS Chevy Volts (which aren't even being made anymore).

How about when Russia first invaded Crimea? Or the Saudis assassinated that journalist? Or Venezuela tried to make their oil an assets for supporting a socialist autocracy?

Now that Brandon has brought back the oil crisis and the stagflation of the 1970's, you want to pretend that NOW's a good time to drive down demand for oil with "renewable energy"?

Give me a fsckin' break, as if we haven't been pursuing renewable energy solutions for decades now.

Tenchusatsu