Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francis Muir who wrote (47413)	2/10/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: Dale Stempson	Respond to of 58324

Re: >>>you won't see anyone suing SyQuest unless the lawyers are being paid up front.<<< Actually, Syquest has a number of lawsuits still pending with them. I believe one or two of them have to do with the same situation as it occurred a couple years ago. These things tend to go on forever. Regards - Dale

To: Francis Muir who wrote (47413)	2/10/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: Michael Coley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

RE: Things you won't see? >> However I would point out that one reason for this legal activity is that Iomega has rather deep pockets -- you won't see anyone suing SyQuest unless the lawyers are being paid up front. << Actually, SyQuest has four class action lawsuits and one derivatives lawsuit. But I think you're right. Most of them are a year or two old--back before the lawyers realized that they would have to take their fees in stock. ;) - Michael Coley - wwol.com