Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (189013)	6/20/2022 3:30:06 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hoa Hao marcher Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217548

I like this: promote solidarity and cooperation among emerging market countries and developing nations and to push for the development of the international order and global governance in a more just and reasonable direction. I want a reconstituted United Nations [and have done for decades - way back when Hu Yaobang went to Wellington and I was in the UN Association there]. How do American spokespersons by contrast seem so simpleton, stupid, dishonest, hypocritical and worthy of contempt. US State Department spokesperson noted that China claimed to be neutral but said Beijing’s behavior made clear that it was still investing in close ties to Russia. Neutrality in investing in both Russia and USA and anywhere else too. Well done China. The US spokesperson said the world was watching to see which nations stand up for the basic principles of freedom, self-determination and sovereignty, and who stands by or tacitly supports Russia in its premeditated and unprovoked war of choice. I'm for freedom, self-determination, sovereignty, but don't see USA supporting those. They dislike press freedom = see Julian Assange, they got Nuland to foment revolution in Kiev with bribery and corruption, military grade weaponry and boots on the ground training for war in the east and activating that. There is a long list of not that good sounding stuff. Which is not to say China is in my good books either = ready to attack the lovely people of Taiwan who might wish to reject Beijing's mating call = marry me or I'll kill you = a very uncharming and needing rejection call to love. Mqurice

To: TobagoJack who wrote (189013)	6/25/2022 8:37:09 AM
From: marcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217548

speaking of hong kong... do you care to comment on the sinking/floating restaurant: Mystery deepens as owners say Hong Kong floating restaurant has not sunk Hong Kong’s distinctive Jumbo Floating Restaurant, established in 1976 by the smuggler turned gambling impresario Stanley Ho Hung-sun, led a storied life. The 80 metre-long restaurant, designed like a Chinese imperial palace, featured as a backdrop to films by Jackie Chan and Steven Soderbergh and hosted guests including Queen Elizabeth II and Tom Cruise before closing in 2020 as the city reeled from the Covid pandemic. It seems that in death it has not lost the power to grab headlines. Hongkongers bade the restaurant farewell last week as it was towed out of Aberdeen harbour. Its owner, Aberdeen Restaurant Enterprises (ARE), did not disclose its destination, but Hong Kong’s marine department later said it was due to be taken to a shipyard in Cambodia. Then on Monday ARE said the vessel encountered adverse weather conditions when passing the Paracel Islands, also known as the Xisha Islands. “The water depth at the scene is over 1,000 metres, making it extremely difficult to carry out salvage works,” the company said in comments that appeared to suggest the vessel had sunk. However, perhaps under pressure from authorities to pass on more information about the apparent wreckage, ARE said on Thursday that the vessel and accompanying tugboat were still in waters near the islands, and therefore reports that the boat had sunk were “inaccurate”. ARE’s PR representatives said on Friday that it was still afloat but that rescue work would be “extremely difficult” due to the depth of the water. On Thursday night Hong Kong’s Marine Department issued a statement saying it had only learned of the incident from media reports and had immediately requested a report from the company. Officials told local press that ARE may have breached the city’s regulations if the owner, agent, or captain did not report a sinking within 24 hours. Failure to give a reasonable explanation on time could result in a HK$10,000 (£1,040) fine. The Guardian contacted ARE for comment. A spokesperson told CNN on Friday that ARE had always used the term “capsize” to describe the incident and had never claimed the vessel had sunk. Before the vessel’s departure, the company said it had been inspected by marine engineers and hoardings had been installed, and all relevant approvals had been obtained. ARE complained last month that the business had not been profitable since 2013 and cumulative losses had exceeded HK$100m. It said the maintenance fees could cost millions every year and about a dozen businesses and organisations had declined an invitation to take the restaurant over at no charge. A lack of maintenance caused a 30-metre kitchen barge connected to the restaurant to sink earlier this month. theguardian.com