SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steven Bowen who wrote (1084)2/10/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: WTC  Respond to of 2063
 
Re: <All the best estimates I've seen indicate that people still believe the auction will take in $4B. >

Well, put me down on the list of auction observers who now expect the auction will bring a small fraction of $4B. The big name, deep pocket participants seem to be following very conservative, very selective tactical plans for augmenting current capabilities, not for developing new national network capabilities. Even the top five or so participants, gauged by up-front payment level, don't seem to have come to the party with the wherewithal to forge a new national access network, with bidding driven upward by competing grand strategies. I just don't think we will see a convergence of "I NEED that license" attitudes that has to occur to drive license prices up. After all, the participants are bidding with real money, not playing some board game. (Even with a 45% discount, it's real money!)

The very interesting, still open question in my mind is just what is the depth of bidding resource, i.e., the internal governance limit, that WNP, Nextband, or BCK/RIVGAM bring to the auction. Just because it's Craig McCaw, or if it had been MSFT/Gates, doesn't mean there is a blank check for this license hunt. I expect we will need to see a few rounds of bidding before anything like a clear picture begins to form as to the bidders' auction objectives -- geographic clustering, A vs. A&B, etc. And there is the strong possibility that for 90+% of BTAs, there may not be much bidding activity at all past the first few rounds.

Perhaps we ought not forget that McCaw has a history of entering FCC bidding apparently just to drive prices up, without any obvious interest in actually securing licenses. That could be a bidding tactic that buys a lot of unwanted licenses this time out!



To: Steven Bowen who wrote (1084)2/10/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: James Fink  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2063
 
Steve,

You are confusing terms. The $186 million figure refers to the upfront payments, not the minimum opening bid which is higher. I haven't figured out whether your error means that the $19.35 figure is too high or too low. On the one hand, your error means that the 21.5 multiple is too high, which suggests a lower estimate. On the other hand, the base of the multiplication is not 90 cents, but $2.25, which suggests a higher estimate.