Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stoctrash who wrote (34862)	2/10/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

freddy my boy.... "I'll try to spark some interest here again" yeah..Don Sew cant bare all the weight on his shoulders...We all need help now and again.... " with a little tool I came up with. Everyone feel free to tear apart the logic, cuz thats what this thread is for, Right?" ROFLMAOSHIHTIASIMP now get the calculator crunching ...... there is a riddle you want answered but my lips are sealed...you need a little tool to unlock them ;-)))) (hint...you were close)

To: Stoctrash who wrote (34862)	2/10/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Kevin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

>>>It seems good for calling 2-7 day swings in the S&P 500. Its NOT to be used alone, like most little indicators though. <<< Hey Fred. Maybe it will be a good combo with my 3-7 day trend indicator. Mine will signal the trend, and yours will signal the change in trend. >>> (since you're not trading... LOL) <<< Hmmm....where have I heard that before??? Seriously, if only I had been trading I would have generated an SPX buy signal either Jan 27 or Jan 28 on both my index trading system and my 3-7 day trend indicator (which is now in the 10th day of a bull trend...so much for 3-7 days). I'd be one happy camper to ride the SPX for the last 50 points. Coulda, shoulda, woulda I guess. Talk to you later.

To: Stoctrash who wrote (34862)	2/10/1998 7:23:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

Okay Speedmeister I am trying to ENJOY your post but I dont know what it means... When it turns up or down from historical levels a warning or signal is given. Anywhere above 25 is a "high" level, and good "lows" normally form ~ -30. is a high level meaning we are going down? feb 2 -5 were above 25... what does that mean IF we werent in a trending market and how do you determine when it is a trending market and not going to work versus....when we are just going UP and it will work... because if it isnt going to work in a trending market it is KEY to determine what is going to make it work and what isnt going to make it work Right now it says we're in a "danger zone" where the market COULD be near a ST peak based on historical levels, BUT a trending market will wack this thing out. I find it best to use a trendline, stop, or somthing else to get you in or out when the trend is your friend, like recent activity seems to indicate. I find eventually divergences take place when the trend starts to peeter out and then finally the market corrects. so is the difference between 2/6 and 2/9 the petering out? Here is some data: 01/30/98,16.0 02/02/98,28.4 02/03/98,28.7 02/04/98,27.9 02/05/98,26.7 02/06/98,23.8 02/09/98,12.4 btw, the my right arm indicator is still over 4 after todays data...

To: Stoctrash who wrote (34862)	2/11/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

second question Speedy I find eventually divergences take place when the trend starts to peeter out and then finally the market corrects. so is the difference between 2/6 and 2/9 the beginning of possible petering out? Here is some data: 01/30/98,16.0 02/02/98,28.4 02/03/98,28.7 02/04/98,27.9 02/05/98,26.7 02/06/98,23.8 02/09/98,12.4 OOHHHHHH maybe my system is about ready to be published ...(for chicken trades only) my very first trade on it is working out!!!! now if I can get those finishing touches done...I need a whole bottle of Jack to deal with that....