SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (189736)7/10/2022 10:04:58 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217800
 
If true, nothing to worry about anymore

If untrue, doesn’t make any difference any more

Either way the war is nearing some end?



To: Snowshoe who wrote (189736)7/11/2022 3:44:47 AM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
fred woodall
kingfisher

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217800
 
I recommend Russia use atomic bombs and see if those help stop the flow of USA, UK and German weapons to Ukraine Putin's troops were suffering from growing "munitions hunger" due to recent Ukrainian attacks.

Ukraine has released videos of massive explosions depicting how Western military aid is helping to blunt the Russian artillery onslaught in Donbas,


Since Germany wants to once again do a Barbarossa on Russia, give Germany a demonstration of 10 megatons on some German tank manufacturer plant. Same for Boris Johnson and Liz Truss = depopulate Downing Street with a kiloton or maybe some UK F35 base or nuclear submarine base with 10 megatons. Give USA something to think about to equalize for the Moscova sinking, such as one of the carrier fleets. Say, the Ronald Reagan. Or maybe Andrews air force base or ... heck the USA is a hugely target rich planetary empire = fire a rocket in any direction and it'll hit a USA military base designed to attack Russia.

Then, as the USA responds, just continue escalating until there's nothing left anywhere in USA territories. Sure, Russia would be generally charred too, but USA has a LOT more to lose and their hearts are not in it. Heck, Americans wouldn't know where Ukraine is, so I doubt they are keen to be fried to charcoal for Zelensky and co to continue to cash in, and for Hunter Biden to keep his cash, cocaine, concubines and Cayman Islands cornucopia overflowing with hedonistic nihilism. Or the Big Guy to get his 10%.

Since the Eurostan and USAUSAUSA bosses want the end of the world, they can easily have it. They say they don't want the end of the world, but they say Russia has to surrender unconditionally and leave Crimea, and whatever else Blinken, Zelensky, Nuland and hey, wait a minute, how come those are all Jews? Maybe there really is a Jewish conspiracy. But on the other hand, Henry Kissinger is with me = forget about Crimea and the east of Ukraine and call for a settlement, just as Putin wanted 9 years ago = a couple of independent new eastern states, Donetsk and Luhansk, with Crimea returned to Russia where it had been for centuries. 8 years of war in the east of Ukraine, thousands of deaths and then the intensifed war this year could have been avoided altogether. Heck, Russia could have been an ally, even a NATO member, with the NATO border at Vladivostok and touching at the Bering Straits = a continuous global region at the northern latitudes.

And forget about the damn Germans taking over Kaliningrad = they forfeited any claim to that when they lost after Barbarossa.

Cancel all sanctions on Russia and get back to Peace, Light, Harmony, Happiness, Health, Prosperity, Fun and Love, which are much better than turning people to charcoal.

Yes, there would be a terrible loss of profits to the USA's armaments manufacturers, but that's not a problem for the average, or most, Americans who would prefer to fill 'er up at their local gas station for $1 a gallon than pay $7 a gallon, or $20 a gallon, then be fried alive.

If we do go to a population reduction of about 95% around the world, that would be great for "Climate Change", aka Global Warming aka Greenhouse Effect. Personally, I prefer billions of people providing huge economies of scale, specialized talents, continued pursuit of life, liberty and enjoying what they achieve, but I'm a weirdo. 500 parts per million CO2 looks really good to me compared with 500 radionuclide particles per lungful. CO2 helps plants grow and reduces the need for irrigation and does not warm the world significantly, as proved after 100 years of burning carbon by the megaton. CO2 = good, strontium 90 = bad.

It looks as though enticing Russia into a trap in Ukraine, then squeezing them hard everywhere else, while cutting supply lines to Kaliningrad and preparing a general conventional onslaught from Murmansk to Sevastopol and Vladivostok wasn't quite the cake walk I guess Kaplan, Nuland, Yulia, Truss, Ursula, Herr Gruppenfuhrer Stoltenberg, Klaus Schwab and cronies calculated. China, India and a good part of the rest of the world don't subscribe to being serfs for USAUSAUSA. They are resisting, backing Russia.

Biden and Boris have jumped the shark. Boris has nearly gone = good riddance. I'm hoping for Jacob Rees Mogg to take over who I'm sure would be much more sensible and reasonable.

Using Ukraine as a base to attack Russia was a bad idea. Much worse than using Afghanistan to attack USSR - Osama bin Laden was NOT on USA's side = Zbigniew "gave USSR their own Vietnam" in cahoots with Carter in Afghanistan, but ooops a daisy, that turned out to be the USA's SECOND Vietnam, from whence they fled last year after 20 years of being ground down with thousands of USA casualties there and another $trillion or so wasted, plus the 9th September losses in 2001 in the Twin Towers, flight 93, and Pentagon.

Mqurice



To: Snowshoe who wrote (189736)7/24/2022 8:06:38 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217800
 
Re <<Ukraine is using US-supplied High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) to undermine Russian artillery superiority by attacking its munition warehouses.>>

… you and I have been lied to, possibly. Watch n brief.




To: Snowshoe who wrote (189736)7/24/2022 8:58:43 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217800
 
Seems 6 of one half a dozen of another



And if just so, then become a numbers thing, how many launchers w/ how many rockets and trained crew, supported by how many infantry and armor, and and and, and of course on whose home territory that is being attrition-ed away.

Given so, USA needs to send boots on the ground because the Europeans and British cannot or dare not.

All eyes on Biden / Blinken / Sullivan / Kamala. Pentagon seems shy. Pelosi busy about Taiwan.