Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alex MG who wrote (243304)	7/11/2022 10:30:59 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 354285

Isn't that what he does with every topic that doesn't suit his cult belief system? If you address the problem broadly you find a snarled mess. It's a huge issue with myriad facets that can only be tamed with massive, rigorous analysis. That's not gonna happen here. I occasionally pick particular narrow questions with easy borders because they are manageable. It's not so easy to change the subject or wander off on a rant although obviously not impossible for him. And it's easy to prove beyond the reasonable doubt of any reasonably smart person that he's all wet. Still, he sloughs them off as he probably will this one. But if the light bulb is to ever going to go off in his head, it will be on small, provable questions that cannot be denied by any smart person. Not that I have any expectation that light bulbs even exist in his dimension. He has affirmatively identified as a dead-ender. I expect that he is committed to that at all costs. But I find exercise healthy. Hence the futility of trying to "reason" with it It's utterly futile to post that Trump is not a deity but a disaster. It's just too big. And it effectively manifests as just more trash talk. It's probably also futile to argue a narrow question. But maybe not utterly futile. And one can at least approximate arguments, wherein lies the exercise.