SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:04:54 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1577919
 
Pregnant Women Can't Get Divorced in MissouriThe state's divorce law has come under more scrutiny since the overturning of Roe v. Wade
By Ryan Krull on Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:06 am

Whoa. Cheating on a newlywed, knocking her up and then not letting her get divorced.... Missourians are real men .... like Trumpy Bear!


Hey, mountains in MO don't get that big ..... how did that women ever get allowed to travel outside the state?



Courtesy Danielle Drake
Lake of the Ozarks attorney Danielle Drake filed for divorce in December 2020. Later that month she discovered she was pregnant.

December 2020 was a turbulent month for Danielle Drake, 32, of Lake of the Ozarks. On December 1, her husband said he was going out with a friend, but he lied. He was actually having an affair. She filed for a divorce less than a week later, on December 7.

Then, not long before Christmas, Drake found out she was pregnant.


Drake knew immediately she had to file a second, amended petition for divorce. She also knew the impact her pregnancy would have on the divorce proceedings. Drake, who earned a law degree from University of Missouri Kansas City has been practicing family law for two years, was well aware that in Missouri, women who are pregnant can't get a divorce.

Missouri law states that a petition for divorce must provide eight pieces of information, things like the residence of each party, the date of separation, and, notably, “whether the wife is pregnant.” If the answer is yes, Drake says, "What that practically does is put your case on hold."

There is a lot of disagreement online about whether pregnant Missouri women can get divorced. The RFT spoke to multiple lawyers who handle divorce proceedings and they all agreed that in Missouri a divorce can't be finalized if either the petitioner (the person who files for divorce) or the respondent (the other party in the divorce) is pregnant.

Dan Mizell, an attorney in Lebanon, Missouri, who has been practicing law since 1997, says that certain aspects of the divorce can proceed, but everything having to do with custody of the unborn child is frozen in place until birth or a pregnancy-ending event like a miscarriage. The court can issue temporary orders related to things like dividing up property, Mizell says. "But they can't do a final decree of divorce until she delivers the baby."

Drake says that this is true even in the case of a divorce that is completely uncontested. "If the couple is not fighting, and they're just saying, ‘Nope, she's gonna take the baby and 100 percent of the things’ they still cannot go before a judge and have that finalized until after there's a baby born," she says.

"It is a shock to some people," Mizell adds. "Sometimes it comes up at the very last minute, because the wife is usually asked to say under oath whether she is pregnant or not, which can be offensive at times, and also a bit ridiculous at others."

Drake also points out what seems to be a double standard in regards to how the state treats an unborn child in a divorce proceeding compared to in abortion law.



Courtesy Danielle Drake
Drake gave birth to her son in August 2021.

She says that the whole basis for Missouri putting the pause on a divorce proceeding until a child is born is because Missouri divorce law "does not see fetuses as humans."

"You can't have a court order that dictates visitation and child support for a child that doesn't exist," she says. "I have no mechanism as a lawyer to get that support going. There's nothing there because that's not a real person."

This aspect of Missouri divorce law has gotten more attention in the weeks since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, triggering a ban on abortion in Missouri except in cases of medical emergency. Though what is meant by medical emergency is still ambiguous.

"This all goes back to the fact that we don't trust women," says Jess Piper, an outspoken advocate for reproductive rights who is running as a Democrat to be the state representative for the 1st District, in the rural northwest corner of the state. "I've heard actual reports of women who have been in domestic violence situations where their husbands withheld birth control from them, purposely creating a pregnancy so that she can't leave."

Piper adds that for some women, the new abortion law in Missouri will be just another obstacle in what can already be a fraught process of leaving a marriage.

Drake and Mizell both say the law is in need of updating.

Mizell says that even if the woman is pregnant by a man other than her husband, the divorce is still on hold.

Drake says that this outdated law is symptomatic of a much larger issue in family law, which is that the "large and clunky legal system" provides only a one-size-fits-all approach, but no two families are alike.

"It's very, very hard to write broad, sweeping laws with families, because every family is different. Every family has unique circumstances."

Drake's divorce is still working its way through the courts. Her son was born in August 2021, and she filed a third petition, this time affirming to the state she is in fact not pregnant.

riverfronttimes.com



To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:11:12 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577919
 
Pence aide: 'Chilling' Secret Service chaos made VP fear for his life on Jan. 6

Matthew Chapman
July 15, 2022\




Vice President Mike Pence. Image via Shutterstock.

On Friday's edition of MSNBC's "The ReidOut," former White House official Olivia Troye tore into the Secret Service. In particular, she emphasized the fear former Vice President Mike Pence had that the agents could go rogue and deliver him to the riot on January 6.

This comes as the Secret Service is accused by the office of the inspector general of deleting evidence from the day of the Capitol attack — which the agency denies.

"Dig into this a little bit more," said anchor Joy Reid. "Tony Ornato is working now in a pretty senior position on Trump's staff at that point. When the vice president express a lack of trust, certainly what it sounds like, is that what it sounds like you to, a lack of confidence in the Secret Service agents who were trying to put him in that car, that is a problem national security-wise, but it also sounds like he might have understood that the Secret Service had, potentially, a political agenda."

"Yes," said Troye. "I worked very closely with the Secret Service detail with Mike Pence. They are incredible law enforcement officers, but I will say this. One thing that I found incredibly chilling when I sat at the January 6th hearing, when Greg Jacob testified ... he did say that Mike Pence's response to the Secret Service agents was, yes, but you're not the one driving the car, and I found that detail striking to me because that's saying something right there, right? That means that he's like, it's not that I don't trust you, who has been with me this entire journey during this assignment, but it's more the fact that I — I don't trust that the person driving the car is not going to drive off to wherever it is."

Troye then dug into her personal experience with the people involved in the incident.

"That goes to a story, you know, that's been told ... by The Washington Post where General Kellogg actually went and supposedly spoke to Tony Ornato and said we're not going to move him. I know you guys. I know what you're capable of. Why would he say that to Tony Ornato, the Secret Service person? What would make him say that? I know General Kellogg well. He was actually my direct boss ... and I know he's very honest. He may not be honest publicly, but behind the scenes he called things out, and Tony Ornato apparently, when asked about the story, denied it or through his spokesperson said, you know, it was not accurate or denied it. I find it very curious that there's a certain behavior pattern that we've seen, and I think it's incredibly important, especially for the moment we're in for our country for people to come forward and tell the truth, especially the Secret Service."

rawstory.com




To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:12:05 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577919
 
MAGA rioters ‘both wept’ as they were sentenced to over 3 years in prison for J6 violence: report

Bob Brigham
July 15, 2022




Cody Mattice / DOJ photos.

Two supporters of Donald Trump cried in court on Friday as they were sentenced for their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

"Two New York state men who led a mob that overwhelmed police at the perimeter of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 — then bodysurfed over the top of the crowd at a building entrance and pepper-sprayed officers — were both sentenced Friday to 44 months in prison," The New York Times reported. "Cody Mattice, 29, of Greece, N.Y., and James Mault, 30, of Brockport, N.Y., both wept as they stood before Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell and asked for leniency, apologizing for their actions and saying they hoped to return soon to their families and young children. But Howell noted that prosecutors had already cut them a reasonable deal by dropping charges that could have led to far more prison time, and she imposed the sentences requested by the government. Only four other Jan. 6 defendants have been sentenced to longer prison terms."

Judge Howell said, "they were not patriots on Jan. 6, and no one who broke the police lines and stopped the democratic process was a patriot that day."

Mattice reportedly took video of the two.

Skip in 4s

&urlfix=1&adurl=https://www.adp.com/about-adp/why-adp.aspx%3FCID%3DADPVID_HPROG__VID_Video_CORE_Null_Branded_Brand_MAR_22_1x1_340174263%26utm_source%3D5743397%26utm_medium%3DVID%26utm_campaign%3D28045252%26utm_content%3D532674471_174841773%26utm_term%3D340174263VID%26dclid%3D%25edclid!]

"Text messages obtained by the FBI showed that Mattice and Mault planned for violence on Jan. 6, initially expecting resistance from antifa. They texted family members during the mayhem, and then congratulated each other in the days after the riot, which temporarily halted the certification of the presidential election," the newspaper reported. "Howell read from many of the messages, using the same profanity the men had."

The two men pleaded guilty in April.

ADVERTISEMENT
"Shortly before the police line was breached, Mault attempted to convince officers to stand down and join with the mob," the DOJ announced. "At approximately 2:30 p.m., Mattice pulled down a segment of the metal barricades that stood in front of a police line. He quickly grabbed it with both hands, pulling it away from officers and onto the ground. A short time later, rioters overwhelmed the police line, forcing officers to retreat up a central staircase to the Lower West Terrace. Mattice and Mault were part of the group that assaulted the police line. They stood at or near the front of the group, pushing forward against the officers, who attempted to keep the rioters from advancing."Both men maced officers.

"At approximately 4 p.m., Mattice and Mault approached the tunnel leading into the Capitol Building from the Lower West Terrace," DOJ said. "They attempted to push through the crowd and climbed up and body-surfed over other rioters. After reaching the tunnel, they grabbed onto and hung from the wooden frame surrounding the arch. Mattice reached out to another rioter and grabbed a small object appearing to be a canister. He then sprayed chemical spray at police officers. After doing so, Mattice fell back and into the crowd. Mault likewise obtained a small canister containing chemical spray from another member of the crowd, and he, too, sprayed it at officers defending the tunnel."

rawstory.com



To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:13:06 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577919
 
mineDzheppar

Ukraine government official


#Russia's missiles in #Vinnytsia yesterday claimed the lives of this boy and his mother. They were killed in one of the city's medical centres, where they came for an appointment. R.I.P. Memory eternal. #RussiaIsATerroristState #StandWithUkraine #RussianWarCrimes




To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:14:06 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577919
 
County GOP in Kentucky Posts Wildly Anti-Semitic Comments About Biden Nominee and ‘The Jewish Junta’ on Official Facebook Page
By Michael LucianoJul 15th, 2022

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A Republican Party organization in Kentucky reacted to the Senate confirmation of Steve Dettelbach as director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives by calling it a win for “the Jewish junta.

Dettelbach’s confirmation was a contentious one. Republicans seized on comments he made as a Democratic candidate for Ohio attorney general in 2018. During his confirmation hearing, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked about his past statements about wanting to ban assault weapons.

“When I was a candidate for office, I did talk about restrictions on assault weapons.,” Dettelbach told him. “I did not define the term. And I haven’t gone through the process of defining that term.”

The Senate confirmed him by a vote of 48-46 on Tuesday. On Friday, the Bracken County Republican Party posted a wildly anti-Semitic message on its Facebook page pointing out that Dettelbach is Jewish while also claiming, “The Jewish junta is getting stronger and more aggressive.” The post also took Republican Sens. Ben Sasse (NE) and Jim Risch (ID) to task for not voting, with the post referring to the latter as “Risich”:

A Jewish anti-gun activist, Steve Dettelbach, has just been made director of the ATF. The Jewish junta is getting stronger and more aggressive.

He won the nomination 48 to 46, thanks to two Republican Senators voting for him (Susan Collins of Maine and Rob Portman of Ohio), as well as Ben Sasse (Nebraska) and Risich [sic] of Idaho not even showing up to vote — an obvious tactical choice since they don’t want to have to explain it to their heavily rural gun loving voters in the future.

Sasse and Risich [sic] could’ve caused a tie and forced Biden to have to send Kamala Harris to break it. Could’ve been a huge publicity moment for the GOP as midterms near, but they passed on it. It’s obvious they want to move on from having to defend gun owners.

The post was first reported by the Louisville Courier-Journal. The Bracken County GOP removed it after being contacted about it by a reporter from the paper.

“Earlier today, I was made aware of an inappropriate post on the Bracken County GOP Facebook page,” the GOP county chair wrote on Facebook. “That post does not represent the values of the Bracken County Republican Party. It was incredibly insensitive. We will investigate how this occurred and we commit to tighter oversight of our social media going forward.”\\

mediaite.com



To: locogringo who wrote (1367042)7/16/2022 7:19:35 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1577919
 
Didja know Joe Biden knows we didn't have airports during the Rev. War?

Trumpy Bear didn't.