Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pocotrader who wrote (1368471)	7/25/2022 6:37:13 AM
From: IC720	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575761

Wow, so Hillary/msm are fake? Thx, good to know! How bout cycles? Believe in Cycles, everything in Universe connected? What odds ya give here?? I mean c'mon, even if considering yourself half Girl Scout should feel chance is 30/70 and prepare little... Will 2022 be the High in Temperatures? "The high in temperature was 1932 and thereafter the low was 1977. That was a 45-year cycle which ironically brought us to 2022 The danger here is that we are in a cycle like the 1930s that produced the Dust Bowl. However, keep in mind that this means we will see extremes on both sides. So while we will experience hotter temperatures than normal in 2022, there is also the risk of extremely cold temperatures in the winter. If the temperatures exceed the high here in 2022 next year, then it is possible to see a continued hotter summer trend into 2025. However, looking at this Timing Array, if 2022 remains as the 45-year high, then we can see terrible cold into 2025. So the question here is do we get a cycle inversion with continued heat and another Dust Bowl into 2025, or will the ground freeze as in the late 18th century prevent any winter crops. **Time/space/math/humans repeat/Sun. Adds up..better increase to 40/60. Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity is one of the most ignored fundamentals that applies even to economics. We see many people in general are unable to grasp the deep meaning of what Einstein truly discovered. This blindness stems from our linear perception of time. Relativity was something much more important than providing plots for movie adventures. Einstein wrote: “Since there exists in this four dimensional structure [space-time] no longer any sections which represent “now” objectively, the concepts of happening and becoming are indeed not completely suspended, but yet complicated. It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, the evolution of a three dimensional existence.” In reality, the theory of relativity applies in markets far more than most would even ponder. True, it is extremely complex. It is virtually impossible for most people to contemplate the fourth dimension outside of a straight line concept of a steady flow in one direction. How do we measure and deal with a dimension that can be altered by gravity? If there is no real “now”, is it possible that waves of time flow through all dimensions yet yield the illusion of “now”? Time dilation is an actual difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers either moving relative to each other or differently situated from gravitational masses. Nevertheless, being able to map the flow of time and relate it back to a three dimensional world is tricky, but our only hope. ....**