Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Secret Recipe who wrote (1051)	7/28/2022 8:32:25 PM
From: chowder	2 Recommendations Recommended By INCOGNIT0$ red cardinal Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21887

I believe there is a difference between something's value and what it might be priced at. We see this in art, real estate, coins and other commodities. A company can be valued at one level yet be selling at a very different price point. A company may be underperforming but its assets do have value. The worst case scenarios I presented is what the company's intrinsic value is worth in a bear market. I substituted the word bear for worst. The company's value can change as new information comes in, but when I'm looking at intrinsic value, I'm looking at the company's value based on what it's worth today. Think of it like net asset value (NAV). A company can trade at a premium or discount to NAV where price can be driven by emotion, not fundamentals. So, when I take the current condition of the market into consideration, there are companies I deem worth buying based on their bearish valuations at this time, values that I think will increase in the future. I'm not always correct but we do have to start somewhere. Where would you suggest?