Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (25365)	7/30/2022 7:57:22 AM
From: gg cox	Respond to of 37138

Who’s correct? Message 33942437 China.. time.com Why bother???

To: russet who wrote (25365)	7/30/2022 1:05:51 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37138

>> And increased CO2 from burning fossil fuels is extremely advantageous to life on this planet. << Before you get too excited ... The vegetation cooling effect is large from the energy dissipation perspective, but only about 10%-20% compared to the pace of global warming. The cooling effect from greening is less significant in tropical forests with high leaf areas. “This is a warning sign about climate change. We should be cautious that the rainforests, which are at the forefront of the fight against global warming, are reaching the limits of their capacity to absorb carbon and cool the surface.” commented Dr. Rama Nemani, from NASA’s Ames Research Center. nasa.gov The NYT had an article on all this back in 2018 ... ‘Global Greening’ Sounds Good. In the Long Run, It’s Terrible. Rising carbon dioxide levels are making the world greener. But that’s nothing to celebrate. nytimes.com