Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (1370454)	8/11/2022 5:18:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578105

Qone0, I'm on the side of the law. If Trump broke the law, the search warrant is justified. One argument I heard, however, is that Hillary Clinton also broke the law in a similar manner and illegally retained classified documents. She never had her house raided. And James Comey, FBI director at the time, declined to recommend charges even though he called her actions "extremely careless." At the time, I was highly skeptical of the difference between "extreme carelessness" and "gross negligence": Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 30678405 (siliconinvestor.com) What if Trump was found to be "extremely careless"? Will his motives be deemed "benign" like Hillary's were? If so, will he get a #hillarypass? Tenchusatsu