Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawk who wrote (7500)	2/10/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: mike smith	Respond to of 13594

But why did the stock price begin to rise? People started to cover their short positions once the stock price started to jump? The news must have been well received to start this snowball effect. Its hard to understand this because the behavior of AOL cannot be compared to conventional stocks.

To: Hawk who wrote (7500)	2/10/1998 10:52:00 PM
From: David O'Berry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13594

Help me out here. Why does the consolidated statement posted on Reuters state that all numbers going back 1.5 years are unaudited. Does unaudited mean something different than what I am interpreting. If not then how can a public company not have an audit within the last 1.5 years on their numbers. Please clue me in if I am missing something. The word "unaudited" always scares the daylights out of me. Nothing good ever came out of unaudited numbers for any extended period of time. Thanks, David doberry@mindspring.com